Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Sathish Kumar, J
Devanna Gounder @ Devannasamy – Appellant
Versus
Umaiyal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. consideration of additional documents (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT :
2. For the sake of convenience, parties are referred to as per their own ranking in the Trial Court.
b. Thereafter, Chellappa Gounder, agreement holder Manoharan and the first defendant entered into a sale agreement dated 08.10.19990, which Chellappa Gounder agreed to pay a sum of Rs.1,30,000/- to the agremennt holder and Rs.1,45,000/- to the first defendant. However, the first defendant has sold the property to an extent of 10 cents in S.F.No.518/1 at Veerapandi Village in favour of Manoharan, that apart, sold the property to an extent of 15 cents in S.F.No.518/1 at Veerapandi Village in favour of one Arputharaj.
d. After 7 years of passing of the deree for partition, the first defendant has filed another suit in O.S.No.1382 of 1998 and the same was re- numbered in O.S.No.3755 of 2004 on the file of II Additional District Munsif, Coimbatore questioning the compromise decree passed in O.S.No.1 of 1991. The plaintiff has filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC and the same was dismissed on 30.03.2011. Challenging the dismissal, the plaintiff have filed revision before this Court in CRP.No.3996 of 20
The court affirmed that a compromise decree reached finality and cannot be challenged in subsequent proceedings, establishing the plaintiff's ownership and entitlement to possession.
Family property - family settlement must be a bona fide one in order to resolve family disputes and rival claims by a fair and equitable division or allotment of properties between the various member....
When they are not shown to be in any manner perverse, illogical and irrational, resultantly, the substantial questions of law formulated are accordingly answered infavour of the plaintiff and against....
The burden of proof in establishing the existence and extent of an oral partition lies with the party claiming such partition.
In the absence of established oral partition, co-owners have equal shares in the property, as per Section 47 of the Transfer of Property Act.
In a partition suit, all legal heirs must be parties, and failing to prove a settlement deed invalidates claims to partition. The court upheld the necessity for complete participation of all heirs in....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between ancestral property and self-acquired property in a partition suit, and the requirement for evidence to support claims of jo....
The judgment emphasizes the importance of establishing ownership over property and highlights the consequences of a compromise decree on property rights.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
