Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dr.Justice G.Jayachandran, Ms.Justice R.Poornima, JJ
M.Vijay Anand – Appellant
Versus
Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The appellants herein have been found guilty of cheating Customs Department in respect of duty drawback evasion and therefore, the following penalty was imposed on them:-
“(xvii) I impose a penalty on the following exporters under Section 114(iii) and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962.
a) Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) on M/s Shri V. Satheesh, proprietor of V.V.S. Exports, Tuticorin.
b) Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) on Shri T. Latton Durai, Proprietor of M/s Santhosh Imports & Exports, Tuticorin.
c) Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) on Shri A. Maria John Bosco, Proprietor of M/s St. Antony Imports & Exports, Tuticorin.
d) Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) on Shri S. Sivakaminathan, Proprietor M / s Shivaa Impex, Tuticorin.
e) Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) on Shri G.Subash Chandra Bose, Proprietor of M / s Gayathri International Imports & Exports, Panagudi.
f) Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) on Shri A. Suresh Antonio Inbaraj, Proprietor of M / s Ruby Imports & Exports, Tuticorin.
g) Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) on Shri S. Sathish Kumar, Proprietor of M/s Vadivel Imports & Exports, Tirunelveli.
h) Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs only) on Shri R. R
The imposition of joint and several liability for customs duty evasion lacks legal foundation; penalties must reflect individual culpability and comply with current law regarding pre-deposit requirem....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the imposition of penalties under the Customs Act, 1962 and the liability of an overseas entity for participating in a conspiracy to evade customs ....
The judgment establishes the application of the strict liability principle under the Customs Act, emphasizing the absence of mens rea for contravention and the judicial exercise of discretion by the ....
Fraudulent documents render transactions void; importers must exercise due diligence to avoid liability for penalties under the Customs Act.
The court discussed the necessity of balancing enforcement of penalties with considerations of undue hardship, allowing for a modification of pre-deposit requirements due to financial distress.
Failure to adhere to KYC norms by a Customs House agent justifies the imposition of penalties under the Customs Act for complicity in illegal activities.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
