SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 3672

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
J.Nisha Banu, S.Srimathy, JJ.
Teachers Recruitment Board, Represented by its Chairman and ors. - Appellants
Versus
Jefry Stairish and ors. – Respondent
W.A. (MD) Nos.309 to 313 of 2025 and CMP(MD)Nos.2387, 2389, 2390, 2393 and 2396 of 2025
Decided On : 19-02-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.V.R.Shanmuganathan
For the Respondent: Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy, Senior Counsel for Mr.T.Aswin Raja Simman, Mr.J.Ashok, Additional Government Pleader

Candidates pursuing teacher training courses are eligible for the Teacher Eligibility Test, regardless of their year of study, as clarified by the Supreme Court and NCTE.

Headnote:(A) Teachers Recruitment Board Notification No.1/2022 - Eligibility criteria for Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) - Candidates pursuing B.Ed. degree not in final year rejected for TET - Court held rejection arbitrary as candidates qualified under NCTE guidelines - Clarification from NCTE emphasized that 'pursuing' includes those not in final year - Writ Court set aside rejection order. (Paras 2.1, 8, 12, 18)

(B) Interpretation of 'pursuing' - Supreme Court clarified that 'pursuing' means undergoing a course, not limited to final year - Candidates admitted to teacher training courses are eligible for TET irrespective of year. (Paras 4, 5)

Facts of the case:
The writ petitioners, who were pursuing B.Ed. degrees, were rejected from TET on grounds of not being in their final year, despite passing the exam. They challenged this rejection citing eligibility under the TRB notification and NCTE guidelines.

Findings of Court:
The court found the rejection arbitrary and upheld the eligibility of candidates pursuing B.Ed. courses, ordering their inclusion in the selection list.

Issues: The main issues were the interpretation of 'pursuing' in the context of eligibility for TET and the validity of the rejection based on final year status.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the term 'pursuing' encompasses all candidates undergoing teacher training courses, affirming that eligibility should not be restricted to final year students. The TRB's interpretation was deemed incorrect.

Result: Writ appeals dismissed, and the rejection orders set aside.

JUDGMENT :

J. NISHA BANU, J.

These writ appeals are filed against the common order dated 02.08.2024 made in W.P(MD)Nos.18804, 18387, 18386, 18388 and 18389 of 2024.

2. The facts leading to the filing of these writ appeals are as follows:

The 1st respondent in all the writ appeals / writ petitioners appeared in the examination for direct recruitment to the posts of Graduate Assistant / Block Resource Teacher Educators (BRTE)-2023, called for by the Teachers Recruitment Board. They have also possessed the qualification of Teacher Eligibility Test(TET). They were successful in the written examination and thereafter, they participated in the certificate verification. However, their candidature were rejected on the ground that they were not pursuing final year of B.Ed., degree when they appeared for the Teacher Eligibility Test. Challenging such rejection, the 1st respondent in all these appeals filed writ petitions.

2.1. Before the Writ Court, the 1st respondent in all the appeals had contended that as per the Notification No.1 / 2022 of the Teachers Recruitment Board (TRB), dated 07.03.2022, any candidate having qualified in B.Ed., programme recognised by the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE), or a person who is pursuing any of the Teacher Education Course, is eligible to apply to the said post and therefore, the rejection of the candidature, stating that the writ petitioners were pursuing second year of B.Ed., degree, while they appeared in the Teacher Eligibility Test, is arbitrary.

2.2. Countering to the said contentions, the department had contended before the Writ Court that merely because the writ petitioners were allowed to write the written examination, it does not mean that they are the eligible candidates, yet they have to satisfy the eligibility criteria as per the recruitment notification. In this regard, the Writ Court took note of the clarificatory letter dated 04.08.2022 issued by the National Council for Teachers Education pursuant to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Omkar Singh and others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others, reported in (2021) 14 SCC 486. Holding that the word 'pursuing' finds place in the recruitment notification can only mean undergoing or proceeding further and a limited interpretation that the candidate who is pursuing the requisite course should be in the final year, cannot be given, the Writ Court set aside the impugned rejection order insofar as the 1st respondent in these appeals are concerned and allowed the writ petitions. The relevant passage of the common order passed by the Writ Court is worth reproduction:

''8. The above clarification has been consequent to the order made by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.5564/2019 (arose from S.L.P.(C).No.16698 of 2018 and it was disposed of on 16.07.2019. In fact, the subject matter of the above proceedings is the interpretation for the word “pursuing” adopted in similar such Notification issued by the State of Punjab. A doubt was raised by some of the candidates with regard to the word “Pursuing”. While disposing of those litigations, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has given the following order:

“Para 8.3 ... as per dictionary meaning, the word “Pursuing” means undergoing and / or proceeding further. Therefore, a candidate who has been admitted in any of the TTC and undergoing the teacher training course (TTC) can be said to be “Pursuing” such teacher training course and shall be eligible to appear in the TET examination, irrespective of the fact that whether, by the last date specified for filling up the online form for TET examination, he has, in fact, appeared in the examination of the concerned teacher training course and the result is awaited. “Pursuing” the requisite teacher training course is sufficient to make such a candidate eligible to appear in the TET examination. Therefore, on a fair reading of Clause 5(ii) of the NCTE guidelines, a person who has been admitted in TTC and is pursuing, he / she can appear i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top