SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(UK) 39

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL 
RAKESH THAPLIYAL, J.
Vinay Kumar and Others – Appellants
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and Others – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 2292 of 2018, Writ Petition No. 172 of 2019
Decided On : 11-11-2025
Advocates Appeared : 
For the Appellants : Mr. V.B.S. Negi, Ms. Swati Verma, Mr. S.C. Bhatt
For the Respondents : Mr. P.C. Bisht, A.S. Rawat, Tapan Singh, Yogesh Kumar Pacholia, Shashank Upadhyay

Eligibility for teacher appointments in State-run institutions strictly requires passing TET per State regulations, as CTET alone does not suffice.

Headnote:(A) Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 - Sections 2(a) and 2(n) - Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) - Dispute regarding eligibility of candidates for Assistant Teacher positions - Court determined that only TET trained candidates are eligible as per amended Rules and NCTE Guidelines; CTET qualified candidates cannot be appointed in State-run institutions. (Paras 2-4, 31-37)

(B) Eligibility Criteria - Eligibility conditions to be strictly adhered to according to guidelines - The amendment of 2016 reinforced the necessity for TET qualification specifically for the positions under State Government. (Paras 5-7, 31-37)

Facts of the case:
The appellants challenged the appointment of private respondents to Assistant Teacher positions, arguing that only TET qualified candidates are eligible under applicable State regulations following amendments influenced by NCTE notifications.

Findings of Court:
The court confirmed that the eligibility for appointments in State-run schools necessitates passing the TET conducted by State authorities, reaffirming the terms set out by NCTE post-amendment.

Issues: Whether the eligibility for Assistant Teacher appointments includes candidates qualified by CTET when the advertisement explicitly mentioned TET qualifications.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the eligibility criteria for teacher appointments must align with the specific State amendments and NCTE notifications, thereby excluding CTET trained candidates from State teacher eligibility.

Result: Writ petitions disposed of in favor of the private respondents.

Table of Content
1. challenge to appointment eligibility based on tet qualifications. (Para 1 , 2 , 4)
2. arguments about eligibility based on tet and ctet interpretations. (Para 3 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. adjournment of the matter for further consideration. (Para 8)

JUDGMNET :

Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

1. Appointment of the private respondents have been challenged by the petitioners who admittedly qualified TET Examination conducted by the State.

2. An advertisement was issued for appointment of the Assistant Teacher in primary institutions run by the State Government. The eligibility has been prescribed under 2012 Rules which was time to time amended in 2014 and lastly in 2016, and after last amendment of 2016, the advertisement was issued on 17.02.2016. Mr. V.B.S. Negi, learned senior counsel argued that 2016 amendment is based upon the NCTE Notification of 2010 followed by the subsequent notification of 2014 whereby relaxation was given to those candidates who were having B.Ed degree to qualify TET examination. He submits that as per 2014 Rules only TET trained are eligible to be appointed as Assistant Teacher in primary institution run by the State Government. He submits that so far as CTET qualified students are concerned, they are not eligible to be appointed as Assistant Teacher run by the State Government rather they are eligible to be appointed in the primary institutions run by the Central Government. In support of his argument, he refers Section 2 and 2(n) of the RTE Act which reads as under:-

“2(a) “appropriate Government” means

(i) in relation to a school established, owned or controlled by the Central Government, or the administrator of the Union territory, having no legislature, the Central Government;”

Section 2(n)(i) of the 2009 Act reads as follows

“2(n) “school” means any recognised school imparting elementary education and includes –

(i) a school established, owned or controlled by the appropriate Government or a local authority.”

3. By referring the aforesaid definition clause, Mr. Negi submits that from the definition clause it is very clear that the appropriate government, in respect of the institution run by the Central Government is the Central Government and for the institution run by the State Government the appropriate Government is the State Government. He submits that the advertisement was issued in respect of the institutions run by the State Government, therefore, only TET trained candidates are eligible to the appointed and not CTET trained candidates.

4. N.C.T.E. also filed counter affidavit wherein it is stated that in respect of the institutions for which the advertisement has been issued, only TET trained candidates are eligible.

5. In furtherance of his arguments, Mr. V.B.S. Negi submits that the notification of the N.C.T.E. dated 23.08.2010, also referred guidelines issued by the Central Government on 11.02.2011 which is at page 615 of the paper book and clause 10 of guidelines is relevant which read as under:-

No. 76-4/2010/NCTE/Acad dated 11.02.2011

To, All Secretaries/Commissioners of Education of State Governments/UTs

Subject: Guidelines for conducting Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act (RTE) 2009

Sir/Madam,

In accordance with the provisions of sub-section (1) of Section 23 of the RTE Act, the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) had vide Notification dated 23rd August, 2010 laid down the minimum qualifications for a person to be eligible for appointment as a teacher in classes I to VIII. It had been inter alia provided that one of the essential qualifications for a person to be eligible for appointment as a teacher in any of the schools referred to ion clause (n) of Section 2 of the RTE Act is that he/she should pass the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) which will be conducted by the appropriate Government in accordance with the Guidelines framed by the NCTE.

In this regard, please find enclosed the Guidelines for conducting the Teacher Eligibility

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top