SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(UK) 39

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
LAXMAN SINGH SAMANT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


JUDGMNET :

Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

1. Appointment of the private respondents have been challenged by the petitioners who admittedly qualified TET Examination conducted by the State.

2. An advertisement was issued for appointment of the Assistant Teacher in primary institutions run by the State Government. The eligibility has been prescribed under 2012 Rules which was time to time amended in 2014 and lastly in 2016, and after last amendment of 2016, the advertisement was issued on 17.02.2016. Mr. V.B.S. Negi, learned senior counsel argued that 2016 amendment is based upon the NCTE Notification of 2010 followed by the subsequent notification of 2014 whereby relaxation was given to those candidates who were having B.Ed degree to qualify TET examination. He submits that as per 2014 Rules only TET trained are eligible to be appointed as Assistant Teacher in primary institution run by the State Government. He submits that so far as CTET qualified students are concerned, they are not eligible to be appointed as Assistant Teacher run by the State Government rather they are eligible to be appointed in the primary institutions run by the Central Government. In support of his argument, he refers Se

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top