IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
General Manager Mailam India Limited – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Pondicherry – Respondent
ORDER :
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
The Writ Petition is filed challenging the award of the Labour Court, Puducherry, dated 04.03.2010 made in I.D.No.12 of 2004.
2. The factual background in which the Writ Petition arises is that the Workman - M.Venkatesan was employed in the petitioner – Management with effect from November 1990. While so, on 20.06.2002 there was an incident in the petitioner – Management and the same was reported to the police immediately. The said letter as such is extracted hereunder:-
“Dear Sir,
We are engaged in the manufacture of welding electrodes at the below mentioned address since 1990. In our factory on June 12, 2002 at about 8.45 A.M two employees Mr.M.Venkatesan and Mr.M.Mohan had quarelled and hit each other which resulted in injury for both. Both the injured were sent to hospital for first aid but Mr.Venkatesan refused to go for first aid. After first aid when Mr.Mohan was coming back from hospital he was hit heavily by a group of about six persons near Sedarapet bus stop leaving him injured. After these incidents a group of about 20 people entered our factory premises on the same day evening and threatened us and our employees using harsh words. Further

Usha Breco Mazdoor Sangh Vs. Management of Usha Breco Limited and Another
The absence of a fair opportunity to cross-examine witnesses renders a disciplinary enquiry invalid, and charges not substantiated by evidence cannot warrant dismissal.
The court reinforced that adherence to natural justice is essential in domestic enquiries, and failure to comply can invalidate disciplinary actions.
The standard of proof in disciplinary proceedings is 'preponderance of probabilities', allowing for evidence that is logically probative, and excluding strict adherence to the Indian Evidence Act pro....
The court emphasized the need for proper inquiry under the Industrial Disputes Act, affirming that wrongful termination without due process warrants reinstatement with continuity of service and back ....
Dismissal without a proper inquiry is unjustifiable; individual misconduct must be proven for disciplinary action, affirming the right to strike as a legitimate demonstration.
The principles of natural justice require a fair enquiry process where all relevant documents are made available to the workman, and failure to do so invalidates disciplinary actions.
Misconducts - Award Modified - Workman was earning by plying rickshaw since his dismissal i.e. from 1990, appropriate relief may be moulded in favour of workman by tilting balance -Workman be paid re....
The court affirmed that a domestic enquiry must adhere to principles of natural justice, including the service of charge-sheets, and modified the award to grant only 50% back wages due to lack of evi....
Discipline and misconduct at the workplace justify dismissal; judicial review cannot re-evaluate evidence or findings of fact from disciplinary bodies.
The court upheld the dismissal of the employee for attempted theft, confirming the fairness of the domestic inquiry and the appropriateness of the punishment despite claims of procedural irregulariti....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.