Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
S.K. Chelliah – Appellant
Versus
Secretary, Transport Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai – Respondent
ORDER :
The petitioner an unfortunate employee of the respondent Transport Corporation, retired from service on 31.12.2006 after a period of 26 years has approached this Court seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to calculate his pension benefits by counting his period of service as 26 years, instead of 18 years.
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that his pension benefits were calculated by taking into account of the petitioner's service as 18 years, instead of 26 years.
3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed as a Driver in the 2nd respondent transport Corporation on 23.01.1981, his services were regularised on 01.09.1982, he continuously served for 26 years and retired from service on 31.12.2006. However during the year 1990, he caused an accident and therefore he was imposed with a punishment of dismissal from service. This order of dismissal from service was challenged by the petitioner before the Labour Court, Madurai in ID.No.275 of 1990, which was allowed by order dated 01.12.1992 with a direction to the respondent corporation to reinstate the petitioner with continuity of service, but without back wages. This orde
The court upheld the principle that an employee's reinstatement and continuity of service must be recognized for pension calculations, as affirmed by the Labour Court and High Court decisions.
Point of law: Service Laws – Continuity of service – Pension – Direction to grant the benefit of continuity of service to the workman and consequently, compute the length of service, make the necessa....
Pension benefits cannot be denied based on alleged service disruption unless expressly stated; periods of suspension should not be counted against eligibility.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the Pension Trust Rules to determine the eligibility for pension based on the calculation of pensionable service.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of exhausting alternate remedies and the limited scope of judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
