Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice N. SATHISH KUMAR
G. Kumanan S/o G. Ganapathy – Appellant
Versus
Kuluppai Ramasamy Chettiar Charitable Trust – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. revision petition filed due to alleged jurisdiction issues. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding the validity of the decree. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. legal precedent regarding trustee powers and management. (Para 7) |
| 4. court's examinations of jurisdiction and procedural integrity. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. court’s reasoning on jurisdiction and trust management. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. trustee decisions and their authority despite jurisdictional errors. (Para 15) |
| 7. civil revision petition dismissed. (Para 16) |
ORDER :
1. This civil revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to set aside the decree and judgment dated 09.01.2024 made in O.S.No.541 of 2003 on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif at Cuddalore, on the ground that the learned Munsif lacked jurisdiction.
2. The case of the revision petitioner is that one Ramasamy Chettiar owned a vast extent of property. He created a Trust “Kuluppai Ramasamy Chettiar Charties Sabha” by way of a registered Will dated 27.11.1900. The said Trust is for the benefits of the public. The said Trust was looked after by the family members of the donor and lastly one A.Subram
The court affirmed that a lack of jurisdiction by the District Munsif does not invalidate sales made by trustees of a public charitable trust, particularly when the petitioner approaches the court wi....
Point of Law : Where the allegation of breach of trust, direction for administration of Trust is absent, the suit is maintainable and obtaining leave under Section 92 of the CPC is not necessary.
High Court's Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction barred from rejecting plaint when Order VII Rule 11 CPC offers specific statutory remedy, appealable under Section 96; alternative CPC remedies impos....
The petitioners can be permitted to withdraw the suit to file a fresh suit, and they are liable to satisfy the law of limitation while filing the fresh suit.
Art.227 jurisdiction barred when CPC O.7 R.11 remedy available for plaint rejection.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
