Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
C. Selvaraj – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to the Government, Environment and Forest Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks regularization of driver’s service (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding compliance with regularization rules (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court’s previous rulings on similar cases (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. establishment of ratio decidendi based on precedent (Para 11) |
| 5. final order to regularize petitioner’s service and benefits (Para 12) |
ORDER :
J. Sathya Narayana Prasad, J.
The petitioner has filed this petition to call for the records relating to the proceedings issued by the second respondent in Proc..No.S2/17362/2023 dated 04.09.2023 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to regularise the service of petitioners as driver from the date of initial appointment in the light of W.P.(MD) No.11106 of 2013, dated 12.07.2017 confirmed in W.A.(MD)No.686 of 2017, SLP.No.29276 of 2018 dated 04.09.2018 implemented vide G.O.Ms.No.03 Environment and Forest Department dated 11.01.2019. Order made in W.P.No.2650 of 2019 etc., dated 12.06.2019, for 10 Drivers” similarly placed as that of the petitioner, confirmed in Order made in W.A.No.391 of 2020 etc., as against W.P.No.2650 of 2019 etc., and implemented vide G.O.Ms.No.8 Environment and Forest (FR.2.II
Regularization of service for daily wage employees must adhere to principles of equality and previous judicial decisions supporting entitlement after sufficient service, regardless of breaks.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that contract employees, who have worked for a significant period and possess the necessary qualifications, are entitled to seek regularization of ....
Long-serving contractual employees performing regular duties entitled to regularization consideration on parity with similarly situated juniors, per equality under Articles 14/16.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the denial of regularization of the petitioners' services from the completion of 10 years of service in 2002 was discriminatory and contrary t....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the denial of regularization to a daily waged worker, who fulfills the criteria for regularization as per the government's policy and when a p....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
