IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
T.Veemaraj - Appellant
Versus
The Director General of Police - Respondent
W.P.Nos.2902 & 6164 of 2021 and W.M.P.Nos.3256 & 6783 of 2021
Decided on : 29-01-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the police operation (Para 3) |
| 2. petitioners' claims for promotion (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. government's position on promotions (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. court's analysis of the case (Para 19) |
| 5. court's ruling on individual merit (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 6. final decision of the court (Para 26) |
ORDER :
Challenging the impugned orders passed by the first respondent in RC No.557909/GB-2(1)/2020 dated 10.11.2020 and R.C.No.582264/GB-2(1)/2020 dated 27.01.2021, the present Writ Petitions have been filed by the petitioners herein. Consequently, seeking a direction to the respondents to revise the petitioners' seniority in the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Category-I and Inspector of Police respectively, taking into consideration of the accelerated promotion granted to them and promote them as Additional Superintendent of Police, Category-I and Deputy Superintendent of Police, Category-I at par with their juniors and grant them all consequential service and monetary benefits.
2. Heard Mr.Venkataramani, learned Senior counsel for the petitioners and Mr.R.U.Dinesh Rajkumar, learned Additional Government pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents.
3. The germane facts which leads to the filing of the present cases are as follows:
3.1. The petitioner/Veemaraj joined the service as Grade II Police Constable in 1988 and thereafter selected as SI of Police and promoted as Inspector of Police and was further promoted as Deputy Superintendent of Police, Category I based on accelerated promotion by the Government in G.O. Ms No.959 Home (Pol. IV A) dated 08.11.2013 and assumed office on 13.11.2013 due to administrative delay whereas the petitioner/Vetrivelu who was a graduate joined the service as a directly recruited Sub Inspector of Police in the year 2008.
3.2. In the year 2013, the petitioners being the Inspector of Police and Sub Inspector of Police respectively along with 18 others were assigned with a special task headed by Mr.Narendrapal Singh, IPS, for nabbing the Muslim Fundamentalists namely, Police Fakrudeen, Bilal Malik and Panna Ismail. Based on reliable information, on 05.10.2013, under the guidance of one Mr.Anbu, IPS, the special team including the petitioners after a long struggle for nearly 10 hours, arrested the muslim terror fundamentalists in which one Inspector by name Lakshmanan was attacked with weapons causing severe injuries to him and in consequent to that, one of the fundamentalists by name, Panna Ismail sustained bullet injuries and thus, they successfully completed the operation without any loss of life and property besides recovering 70 kgs of high explosives, ammunition and raw materials for preparing explosives from the said house. Due to the courageous act of the team risking their lives, extensive damages to properties, as well as for loss to many lives nearly 5000 persons, were prevented.
3.3. Considering their effective and risky successful operation, the Director General of Police (DGP) recommended to grant accelerated promotion to all the team members, who were in the operation on 05.10.2013 at Puttur, Andhra Pradesh by creating supernumerary posts. On the proposal of the DGP through his letters dated 30.10.2013 and 06.07.2013, a Committee headed by three officials were formed. The Accelerated Promotion Committee considered the recommendations of the DGP, assessed the individual bravery and valour acts of the police personnels participated in the said operation and being satisfied with their extraordinary bravery and valour acts, recommended the Government vide G.O.Ms No.820, Home Police-IA Department, dated 08.10.2013 for granting accelerated promotion. In view of the recommendations made by the Committee, the petitioners and others were granted accelerated promotion by creating supernumerary posts through G.O.(Ms) No.959, Home Police-1A Department, dated 08.11.2013. Hence, the petitioners herein were promoted as Deputy Superi
The court ruled that individual acts of bravery warrant recognition and promotion, overriding blanket policies that deny seniority based on group promotions.
The court held that seniority must be established based on actual service dates, not retrospective adjustments, reinforcing the principles established in prior rulings regarding promotions and upgrad....
Accelerated promotion from temporary ranks does not confer substantive right or seniority; reversion valid, but drawn benefits protected due to government's error and service risks. (28 words)
The petitioners were entitled to the benefit of FR 22-B, and the respondent authorities were directed to re-fix the scale of pay of the petitioners by giving them the benefit of FR 22-B.
Decision-making process - Judicial review is permissible only to extent of finding whether there is any illegality or arbitrariness in decision-making process and not the decision as such - No justif....
The court held that Government Orders related to upgradation and promotion of police personnel operated prospectively and did not allow for deemed upgradation or promotion.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.