SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 4248

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M.Subramaniam, M.Jothiraman, JJ.
Sujatha - Petitioner
Vs.
The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department - Respondent 
W.P.No.31526 of 2024
Decided On : 30-01-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. M. Radhakrishnan for Mr. Pugalenthi
For the Respondents: Mr. R. Muniyapparaj, Additional Public Prosecutor

Public servants must be utilized exclusively for public duties, and any misuse for personal tasks by officials is impermissible.

Headnote:(A) Prison Manual - Clause 4.02 - Writ of mandamus - Allegations against prison administration regarding improper maintenance and engagement of prison staff for personal work - Government ordered an enquiry into the allegations, leading to corrective measures. (Paras 2-4, 6-8)

(B) Public Servants - Duty to serve public interest - Court emphasized that public servants must not be utilized for personal tasks of officials, reinforcing that such practices are detrimental to public administration. (Paras 8-10)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, wife of a convict, alleged that prison staff were engaged in personal tasks for higher authorities, leading to overcrowding and poor conditions for prisoners.

Findings of Court:
The Government's enquiry revealed no current engagement of prison staff for personal work, and corrective measures were taken to address past irregularities.

Issues: The main issues revolved around the allegations of misuse of prison staff and the conditions within the prison.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that public servants should only serve public interests and that any misuse of their services for personal needs is unacceptable.

Result: Habeas Corpus Petition stands disposed of.

ORDER :

(Order of the Court is made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.)

The writ of mandamus has been instituted to direct the respondents to decide the representation submitted by the petitioner on 29.09.2024.

2. The writ petitioner is the wife of convict prisoner, Mr.Vigneshwarperumal, S/o. Madasamy. The petitioner raised several allegations against the prison administration including engaging the prisoners and prison warders for household works by the higher authorities of prison. On account of the deployment of uniformed personnel for household work in the residences of the higher authorities, the prison administration suffered, which resulted in improper maintenance of prisoners inside the prison across the State of Tamil Nadu.

3. Some of the complaints made are that proper food has not been provided, prison was overcrowded and no steps are taken to provide suitable relief to the prisoners inside the prison as per the rules. Inconvenient and unhygienic situations causing the risk of infections amongst the prisoners are also the concerns raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition. Importantly, as per clause 4.02 of the Prison Manual, there should be one guard for every six prisoners. In the Central Prison-2 at Chennai, 203 Prison Warders should be working including those currently suspended. These Warders are required to operate in three shifts, with 60 Warders per shift. However, in reality, only 15 Warders are deployed per shift. The remaining guards are assigned to work at the residences of the Chief Prison Officers, including the DGP, IG, DIG, SP, Ad.SP and three Jailors.

4. In view of the serious allegations raised against the prison administration, this Court directed the Government to look into the matter and initiate all appropriate actions. The Government considering the gravity of the allegations and to maintain jail administration intact and in accordance with the rules, issued G.O.Ms.No.642 Home (Prison-2 ) Department dated 22.11.2024. The Director General of Police and Head of Police Force , Chennai had issued a memorandum to the Inspector General of Police, CBCID and Intelligence on 14.12.2024 to conduct an elaborate enquiry about the prison authorities, who have engaged the uniformed personnel/public servants for their residential works or personal works, in all the Prisons across the State.

5. In view of the Government Order and the consequential instructions issued by the DGP, this Court granted time to conduct an enquiry by the CBCID and the Intelligence.

6. After conducting an enquiry, status report has been filed on behalf of the first respondent/Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition & Excise Department dated 30.01.2025. The comprehensive report filed by the Government reveals that elaborate enquiry was conducted by the CBCID and Intellligence and the irregularities, illegalities found in prison departments are addressed and measures are taken to correct all such illegalities and irregularities.

7. The report filed by the Government states that presently, no prison warders are engaged to attend the household works/personal works of the officials attached to the prison department. It will be relevant to extract para 9 of the status report, which reads as follows :

" 9. It is respectfully submitted that, during the course of enquiry, the DSPS/AEOs have thoroughly enquired the allegations by visiting the respective Central Prisons, perusing the connected records and examining the witnesses. After completion of the enquiry, each DSP/AEO has submitted his/her report and the reports are enclosed.

i. Tr. M. Prabhu, DSP, OCU-I, CB CID, Chennai has visited the Central Prisons-I & II, Special Prison for Women, Puzhal, Redhills, Chennai, examined witnesses, recorded their statements and collected relevant records. In his enquiry report, he has concluded that "The detailed enquiry conducted by CB CID has revealed that the warders were deputed for duties on three shifts inside the prison at various points

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top