Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSAL
Sanjay Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. misuse of manpower in bsf (Para 4 , 5) |
| 2. no entitlement to engage manpower for personal chores (Para 6 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. lack of authority in the charges against the petitioner (Para 7 , 8 , 10) |
| 4. discrimination argument not valid under law (Para 9 , 13) |
| 5. dismissal of petition based on insufficient legal grounds (Para 14 , 15 , 17) |
JUDGMENT
[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.
CM No.19576/2021 (for exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions and as per extant rules.
2. The application is disposed of.
W.P.(C) 6180/2021 & CM No.19575/2021 (for stay)
3. The petitioner, a Deputy Inspector General (DIG) in the respondents Border Security Force (BSF) and under trial by a General Security Force Court (GSFC), has filed this petition seeking mandamus, directing the respondents BSF to summon the defence witnesses as requested by the petitioner in his representation dated 11th June, 2021.
4. It is the case of the petitioner, that (i) the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) issued Office Memorandum (OM) dated 21st September, 2016 on the subject of "Deployment of Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs) Personnel at the Residences of Retired Officers" and issued dire
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
