SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 4345

N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Sathish Kumar, J.
Syed Maskoor Mohideen, S/o.Syed Mohideen - Petitioner
Versus
Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, Rep By Its Chairman and ors. - Respondents
C.R.P.No.1654, 1655, 1577 of 2020 & 1095 of 2022 and C.M.P.Nos.10178, 10180, 10183 of 2022, 5675 & 5678 of 2022
Decided On : 31-01-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. N A. Nissar Ahmed, Senior Counsel for, Mrs I.Kowser Nissar
For the Respondent: Mr. Avinash Wathwani, for Mrs V.Srimathi for, Mr. T. Velumami

The Waqf Board can only manage waqf under its authority if no existing court scheme is in place; otherwise, modifications require State Government action.

Headnote:(A) WAQF ACT, 1995 - Sections 32(2)(d), 65(5), 66, and 69 - Management of Mylapore Jumma Mosque - The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board assumed direct management, canceling a century-old court scheme; however, the Waqf Tribunal ruled only the State Government can amend existing court schemes. (Paras 12-24)

(B) Authority of Waqf Board - The Waqf Board is statutorily empowered to manage waqf only when no prevailing court scheme exists. (Paras 11-12)

(C) Removal of Mutawalli - Per the management scheme, removal must occur through the committee, not by the Board or through litigation. (Paras 24-24)

Facts of the case:
Dispute over management following removal of a mutawalli. The committee replaced him but faced challenges from both the removed mutawalli and the Waqf Board regarding the authority and legality of management changes. (Paras 2.1-2.4)

Findings of Court:
The court clarified that the Waqf Board's management powers are limited when a court scheme is operational, and any changes require State Government involvement. (Paras 24-24)

Issues: The authority of the Waqf Board to modify existing court-sanctioned schemes and the process for removing a mutawalli. (Paras 11-11)

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that only the State Government can modify or cancel court schemes where they are in operation, ensuring the Waqf Board cannot assume direct oversight in these situations. (Paras 24-24)

Result: C.R.P.No.1655 and C.R.P.No.1654 allowed; C.R.P.No.1577 dismissed; C.R.P.No.1095 allowed; costs to be borne by respective parties.

Table of Content
1. waqf board's authority to modify or dissolve established schemes. (Para 4)

ORDER :

N. Sathish kumar, J.

These Civil Revision Petitions arise out of a dispute over the management of the affairs of Mylapore Jumma Mosque. Admittedly, the said mosque was originally governed by a scheme framed by this court by its judgement and decree dated 22.04.1913 made in C.S.No.89 of 1910.

2.1 Syed Maskoor Mohideen, Joint Mutawalli of Mylapore Jumma Mosque Management Committee approached the Wakf Board by way of an application dated 16.11.2017 complaining about Janab K.M.Mohideen Kunhi, one of the then Mutawalli of the Management Committee of Mylapore Jumma Mosque (removed by the committee) who had refused to handover the charge to the newly appointed Janab T.S.T.Kaznavi Sahib, which was taken as item No.74/2018 - Rc.No.12933/11/B6/Che dated 21.07.2018 by the Tamil Nadu Waqf Board.

2.2 The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, Chennai, by order dated 27.09.2018 disposed of the above mentioned application of Syed Maskoor Mohideen, which was taken on 21.07.202018 (item No.74/2018 -Rc.No.12933/11/B6/Che dated 21.07.2018 ) in the following terms:

“The century old court scheme requires a lot of changes, such charges shall be in the interest of Waqf and its properties. The properties already acquired by the Government and compensation paid are not properly accounted for and it is also noticed that a huge extent of waqf property is allowed to encroach by the third parties by the present committee. Therefore, the court scheme framed in C.S.No.89 of 1910 is hereby cancelled under Section 69 (2) of the said Act with an object to frame new scheme for the administration of the said waqf suo motu by the Board or an application of interested persons within the frame work of the WAQF ACT , 1995.

The Superintendent of Waqf, Chennai, is hereby appointed as Executive Officer of the above waqf under Section 65(5) of the WAQF ACT , 1995. Further, the Board is of the view that new scheme in accordance with WAQF ACT will have to be framed suo motu by the Board or on application of not less than five persons interested within one year and administration shall be handed over to the new committee in accordance with the provisions of the new scheme. Accordingly, the Executive Officer is directed to frame a draft scheme for the administration of the waqf, affixing the same on the notice board of the waqf inviting objections and suggestions and submit to the Board for approval.

The removed mutawalli is directed to hand over all the records and keys of the Waqf to the Executive Officer appointed under Section 65(5) of the WAQF ACT , 1995.

The petition filed by Janab K.M.Mohideen Kunhi is rejected on merit. The committee is also directed to hand over charge of the Waqf to the Executive Officer appointed by the Board, failing which action will be pursued under the provisions of the WAQF ACT .”

2.3 Challenging the above-mentioned order of the Waqf Board dated 27.09.2018 made in item No.74/2018 - Rc.No.12933/11/B6/Che dated 21.07.2018, Syed Maskoor Mohideen, Joint Mutawalli of Mylapore Jumma Mosque/Managing Committee of Jumma Mosque insofar as dissolving the Managing Committee of Jumma Mosque and assuming direction management and also cancelling the scheme framed by decree dated 22.04.1913 in C.C.No.89 of 2010 moved an Auqaf Appeal in A.A.No.6 of 2018 before the Tamil Nadu Waqf Tribunal, Chennai, while the then mutawalli Janab K.M.Mohideen Kunhi (removed mutawalli) moved an Auqaf Appeal challenging the order of the Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, Chennai, dated 29.07.2018 made in Item No.74 of 2018 in Rc.No.129933/11/B6/Chennai.

2.4 The Tamil Nadu Waqf Tribunal, Chennai, held that the power to modify or cancel or settle the scheme is vested only with the State Government and not with the Board and that the board has exceeded its jurisdiction in cancelling the entire scheme with a view to settle a new scheme for the waqf; and thus, by its separate order dated 19.03.2020 disposed of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top