Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. SATHISH KUMAR
P. Vikash Kumar – Appellant
Versus
A. Mohandass – Respondent
ORDER :
(N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.)
These Contempt Petitions arise out of breach of undertaking given by the contemnor before this Court to vacate the subject premises on or before 31.05.2025 and also for disobeying the orders of this Court in C.R.P.Nos.1773 & 1775 of 2024, dated 08.11.2024.
2.Before delving into these Contempt Petitions, the following facts are necessary for the disposal of these Contempt Petitions :
2.1.The contemnor is a practising Advocate of Madras High Court and other Courts. He is also said to have held many posts in the Bar Association. Rent control proceedings were initiated against him by the contempt petitioner, in R.C.O.P.Nos.1317 & 1318 of 2015 on the file of the XIII Court of Small Causes, Chennai, for eviction. In the counter and additional counter filed by the contemnor in the rent control proceedings, his induction as a tenant to the premises, namely, Ground Floor, First Floor and Second Floor, is not disputed by the contemnor. Be that as it may, the contemnor has not conducted the rent control proceedings and he tried to protract the proceedings to the maximum extent. He has filed several litigations and also applications, one after another, to protract th
Breach of an undertaking given before a court constitutes civil contempt, emphasizing the expectation of compliance from advocates. Serious contempt calls for punishment to reinforce respect for judi....
Contempt of Court – Courts ordinarily take lenient approach in a case of some delay in compliance of orders, unless same is deliberate and willful.
The judgment emphasized the importance of wilful disobedience and sincere apologies in contempt cases, highlighting the need for genuine remorse and contrition.
Contempt proceedings necessitate clear evidence of willful disobedience of court orders; mere allegations are insufficient.
Civil contempt is established when a party willfully disobeys a Court order, emphasizing the importance of compliance in maintaining judicial authority.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that willful disobedience of a court order, as defined in the Contempt of Courts Act, can lead to punishment under Section 12 of the Act.
Failure to comply with court orders triggers contempt proceedings, regardless of any pending appeals against such orders or administrative hurdles.
The court emphasized that contempt proceedings should only be initiated when there is a clear case of wilful disobedience of a court's order and that the respondents followed due process to extend cr....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
