IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B.Balaji, J
U.Saravanakumar – Appellant
Versus
J.Yuvana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial proceedings and petition context. (Para 3) |
| 2. arguments from both parties regarding domestic violence claims. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's observations on the merit of the claims. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. ratio governing repeated claims on similar grounds. (Para 10) |
| 5. final ruling and conclusion from the court. (Para 11 , 12) |
ORDER :
P.B.BALAJI, J.
This Civil Revision Petition has been preferred by the respondent in D.V.C.No.16 of 2020 before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur.
2. The 1st petitioner is the husband of the respondent, the petitioners 2 and 3 are the father and mother of the 1st petitioner and the 4th petitioner is the sister of the 1st petitioner and daughter of the petitioners 2 and 3.
3. The respondent/wife has filed DVC proceedings on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur. The petitioners who are arrayed as respondents in the said DVC proceedings have come before this Court seeking to strike off the DVC proceedings.
4. I have heard Mrs.Narmadha Sampath, learned counsel appearing for Mr.S.Kumar Sankar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.Mohanethi, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
5. Mrs.Narmadha Sampath, learne
Repeated allegations based on prior claims without new facts constitute an abuse of process in domestic violence litigation.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.