Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. SATHISH KUMAR, J
Chairman Chennai Port Trust – Appellant
Versus
V.Balaji – Respondent
ORDER :
N. Sathish Kumar, J.
Challenging the orders of the learned Principal Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai setting aside the order of the Estate Officer, the present revisions have been filed.
2. The respondents were during the year 1987 was inducted into the premises of the second petitioner as a licensee at the rate of Rs.65/- per sq.m. per annum. License period was for a period of 10 years. Thereafter, it appears that the second revision petitioner had enhanced the license fee from Rs.65/- sq.m. per annum to Rs.80/- per sq.m. per annum. Thereafter, it appears that the license fee was enhanced to Rs.120 per sq.m. per annum from May 2001 onwards. The same was challenged in WP.Nos.2443 and 22274 of 2005 by the respondents and this Court directed the respondents to approach the civil court. Therefore, the respondent in CRP. No. 1020 of 2025 has been filed to seeking not to disturb their peaceful possession except by due process of law and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from collecting the enhanced rent and for mandatory injunction for fixing rent taking into consideration the amenities and infrastructure available and for other reliefs. The said suit was partly
Post-expiration of a license period, continued possession by a licensee is classified as unauthorized occupation under the Public Premises Act.
The court established that unauthorized occupation of public premises can lead to eviction under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971, and that long-term possession with....
The lack of a finding on the issue of the petitioner's tenancy at the time of resumption was crucial in determining the petitioner's status as an unauthorised occupant.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Competent Officer must provide a reasonable opportunity for the unauthorised occupants to present evidence and be heard before making an e....
Public Premises - Eviction - Section 15 of the Public Premises Act, the Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain a suit for eviction.
The Rent Act does not protect tenants of public premises once the Public Premises Act applies, affirming eviction rights under the latter.
Unauthorized occupation of public premises without lawful authority can lead to eviction under the U.P. Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1972.
A license is a personal right that is not transferable or heritable, and expiry of the original licensee's rights extinguishes claims to possession without proper renewal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
