SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 4536

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.
Gopi - Appellant  
Versus 
Shanthi - Respondent  
C.R.P.No.2315 of 2024 and C.M.P.No.12182 of 2024
Decided on : 19-06-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.A.E.Ravichandran
For the Respondents: Mr.V.Raghavachari  Senior Counsel for Mr.N.R.Anantha Rama Krishnan

The principle of res judicata does not apply when the earlier suit has not reached its finality and the causes of action in the subsequent suit are different.

Headnote:(A) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order 7 Rule 11 - Dismissal of application to reject plaint - Revision filed against order dismissing plea of res judicata as earlier suit not attained finality - The current suit seeks declaration of title based on succession, different from issues in the prior suit. (Paras 3.6, 4, 7, 8, 12, 21)

(B) Res Judicata - The principle does not apply when the prior suit has not reached its final conclusion and the cause of action is different in the subsequent suit. (Paras 10, 14, 20)

Facts of the case:
The plaintiffs sought declaration of title and permanent injunction against prior deeds involving the suit property, based on claims of inherited rights after the death of an ancestor. The trial court dismissed the previous suit, stating it lacked a claim of title.

Findings of Court:
The trial court's dismissal was affirmed, with the current suit deemed valid as it was based on different legal grounds.

Issues: The primary issue was whether res judicata applies given the earlier suit's non-final status and differing causes of action.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that as the earlier suit had not reached finality, principles of res judicata do not apply, allowing the current suit to proceed.

Result: Civil Revision Petition dismissed as devoid of merits.

Table of Content
1. the plaintiffs filed a suit for title declaration and injunction against the defendants. (Para 1 , 4)
2. the revision petitioner argues for plaint rejection based on res judicata. (Para 5 , 6)
3. the court examines the applicability of res judicata and the status of the earlier suit. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. the court rules against the application of res judicata due to pending appeal and differing causes of action. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
5. the court affirms the trial court's dismissal of the application to reject the plaint. (Para 21)

ORDER :

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.

Aggrieved over the order of the IV Additional District Court, Thiruvallur at Ponneri, dated 08.03.2024 in I.A.No.4 of 2023, dismissing the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC to reject the plaint in O.S.No.63 of 2023, the present revision has been filed by the 4th defendant in the suit.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their ranking before the trial Court.

3. Brief background of the case is as follows :

3.1. The plaintiffs have filed the suit in O.S.No.63 of 2023 for declaration of title over the suit property; for consequential relief of permanent injunction as against the defendants 3 and 4; for declaration of the settlement deed dated 16.09.2013 in favour of the 2nd defendant as invalid; to declare the sale deed dated 01.06.2020 in favour of the 3rd defendant and the sale deeds dated 13.07.2022 and 03.08.2022 in favour of the 4th defendant as null and void and not binding on the plaintiffs; to declare the mortgage deed dated 01.12.2022 in favour of the 5th defendant as null and void; and also for permanent injunction.

3.2. Reddy Kuppana Mudali married Aayammal. Reddy Naasamma, Reddy Muthammal and Reddy Munusamy Mudali were the children born to Reddy Kuppana Mudali and Aayammal. Reddy Naasamma and Reddy Muthammal died at young age. They both did not have any issues.

3.3. Reddy Munusamy Mudali's first wife Nallammal was Kanakammal's daughter. Nallammal died issueless. Reddy Munusamy Mudali's second wife was Raakammal, daughter of Sundarammal and Reddy Rangappa Mudali. Reddy Munusamy Mudali and Raakammal had four children namely Balakrishnan, Kamatchi Ammal, Kangammal and C.M.Raja. Balakrishnan and his wife Manikammal had two children Devaraj and Malliga, who both died unmarried. Balakrishnan died about 50 years ago. Manikammal also is no more.

3.4. Reddy Munusamy Mudali and Raakammal had given their daughters Kamatchi Ammal and Kanagammal in marriage and provided them sufficient Shridhana. Kamatchi Ammal got settled with her husband Venkatasubaraju Mudali and Kangammal got settled with her husband Appavu Mudali. Kamatchi Ammal and Kangammal were settled immovable assets by way of settlement and they had given up all their rights and interest in the other family properties of Reddy Munusamy Mudali and Raakammal, including the suit properties. Only the last son C.M.Raja was taking care of Reddy Munusamy Mudali and Raakammal. The 1st plaintiff is the wife of C.M.Raja. Baakialakshmi, wife of Kothandam, Ragini, wife of Sadhasivam, and Gnanasekar (2nd plaintiff) are the children born to C.M.Raja and the 1st plaintiff.

3.5. Reddy Narayana Mudali married Periya Kuzhandhai @ Lakshmi Ammal. Sundarammal and Reddy Kishtappa Mudali were the children born to Reddy Narayana Mudali and Periya Kuzhandhai. Reddy Kishtappa Mudali married Amirthammal. They had no issues. Sundarammal was married to Reddy Rangappa Mudali. Their only daughter was Raakammal, who married Reddy Munusamy Mudali, S/o.Reddy Kuppanna Mudali, as detailed above.

3.6. Reddy Kishtappa Mudali's wife Amirthammal was the daughter of Chellappa Mudaliar and Paapammal. Kulappa Mudaliar and Annammal were the other children born to Chellappa Mudaliar and Pappammal. Kulappa Mudaliar and his wife Lakshmi had four children namely Ponnuvel Mudaliar, Kamsala @ Kowsalya (1st defendant), Prakasam and Rajababu. Out of them, 1st defendant and Rajababu alone are

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top