2025 Supreme(Mad) 4551
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.
Dhanalakshmi, W/o. Ayyasamy – Petitioner
Versus
The District Magistrate cum District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Coimbatore District and Ors. – Respondents
W.P. Nos.31141, 31297, 31165 & 31231 of 2023
Decided On : 25-06-2025
For the Petitioner: Mr. M. Vijaya Ragavan.
For the Respondents:Mr. T.M. Rajangam, Government Advocate.
Timely application is essential for issuance of death certificates; practical difficulties arise in ascertaining dates of death for deceased individuals from many years ago.
Headnote:(A) Relevant provisions regarding death certificates and the issuance criteria under applicable administrative procedures.
(B) The court considered the practical challenges in ascertaining dates of death for individuals deceased many years prior and emphasized the necessity of timely application for death certificates.
(C) Petitioner sought death certificates for deceased family members whose deaths occurred in 1946, 1951, 1960, and 1976, which were denied due to untimeliness of requests.
(D) Court addressed issues surrounding the difficulty of accurately dating deaths occurring decades earlier and the implications for legal heirship. (E) The court ruled that there is no illegality in rejection of death certificates as requested, noting that such claims can be pursued through legal heirship certificate applications. (F)
Result: Writ petitions disposed of without further orders.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks death certificates for deceased relatives. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsel argues for issuance based on local knowledge; respondents cite difficulties. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court highlights obstacles in ascertaining death dates, advises legal heirship follow-up. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. writ petitions disposed without further orders. (Para 8) |
ORDER :
(N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.)
All these writ petitions have been filed seeking for issuance of death certificate to the mother, grandmother, grandfather and paternal uncle of the petitioner, respectively.
2. The case of the petitioner is that her grandmother died in the year 1946, her grandfather died in the year 1951, her paternal uncle died in the year 1960 and her mother died in the year 1976. The petitioner was not having the death certificates of these persons and hence applications were submitted before the Revenue Divisional Officer seeking for death certificate. The Revenue Divisional Officer rejected the same on the ground that such death certificate was not applied within a period of one year from the date of their death. Aggrieved by the same, appeals were filed before the District Collector. The District Collector confirmed the orders of the Revenue Divisional Officer and rejected the appeals. Aggrieved by the same, these writ petitions have been filed before this Court.
3. The learned counsel for petitioner submitted that statements were collected by the Village Administrative Officer from the persons who were residing in the place and persons who knew the family and hence a decision could have been taken by the authority and the death certificate can be granted in these cases. The learned counsel for petitioner, in order to substantiate her submission, relied upon the order passed in W.P.No.7978 of 2025 dated 07.03.2025.
4. Per contra, the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that the respondents will not be able to ascertain the exact date of demise of various persons for whom the petitioner had sought for death certificate, since the death had taken place many years ago and it will be impossible for the respondents to fix their date of death for issuing the death certificate.
5. In the considered view of this Court, the petitioner is seeking for death certificates of the grandmother, who died in the year 1946, the grandfather, who died in the year 1951, the paternal uncle, who died in the year 1960 and the mother, who died in the year 1976. It is not known as to why the death certificate was not obtained during the relevant point of time. In any case, in the year 2020, it is almost impossible for the respondents to ascertain the exact date of death of those who died in the years 1946, 1951, etc.
6. The order that was relied upon by the learned counsel for petitioner will not apply to the facts of the present cases. That was an order which deals with issuance of legal heirship certificate. As has been held by this Court, the Tahsildar, who issues legal heirship certificate, actually satisfies the relationship between the parties after enquiring the persons who knew the family and were residing nearby. However, no one will remember the exact date of death of persons that took place in the years 1946, 1951 etc. Hence there is a practical difficulty on the part of the respondents to issue such death certificate.
7. In the light of the above discussion, this Court does not find any illegality in the proceedings of the respondents rejecting the applications submitted by the petitioner for death certificate. Ultimately, the petitioner is seeking for such death certificate in order to claim herself as the legal heir of the concerned deceased persons. The same can always be established before a Court of law if any proceedings are pending. If the petitioner applies for legal heirship certificate, such enquiry can be conducted by the concerned authority to ascertain the relationship of the petitioner with the concerned deceased person