SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 2254

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.
R.Janaki - Appellant
Versus
The Tahsildar - Respondent
W.P.(MD)No.5252 of 2024 and W.M.P.(MD)No.5038 of 2024
Decided on : 14-06-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.K.K.Udayakumar
For the Respondent: Mr.D.Sasikumar, Mr.P.P.Alwin Balan

A legal heir certificate can be issued without a death certificate if a person has not been heard from for over seven years, invoking the presumption of death under Section 108 of the Indian Evidence Act.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 34 - Legal heir certificate - Petitioner seeks legal heir certificate for father missing for over forty years; jurisdictional Tahsildar directed petitioner to approach civil court - Court held that such a suit is not maintainable and that the Tahsildar is competent to issue the certificate without a death certificate, invoking Section 108 of the Indian Evidence Act. (Paras 2, 4, 7)

(B) Legal presumption - Presumption of death under Section 108 of the Indian Evidence Act allows for legal heirship certificate without a death certificate, as insisting on one would be impossible. (Paras 4, 5)

(C) Authority's duty - Revenue authorities must conduct inquiries and issue legal heir certificates based on available evidence, rather than deferring to civil courts. (Paras 6, 8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, whose father has been missing for over forty years since she was two, seeks a legal heir certificate. The Tahsildar's insistence on a death certificate is challenged.

Findings of Court:
The court set aside the Tahsildar's order, directing an inquiry to issue the legal heir certificate based on the presumption of death.

Issues: Whether the petitioner can obtain a legal heir certificate without a death certificate.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the presumption of death allows for the issuance of a legal heir certificate without requiring a death certificate, affirming the authority of the Tahsildar to issue such certificates.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

ORDER :

Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order in O.Mu.A4/2694/2023 dated 27.06.2023 passed by the first respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to issue legal heir certificate for Mr.S.Ramachandran.

The petitioner's father has not been heard of for more than forty years. The petitioner was two years old when he went missing. She now seeks legal heir certificate for her father. The jurisdictional Tahsildar has taken the stand that the petitioner has to go before the civil court for relief. Challenging the said stand, the present writ petition has been filed.

2. I must straightaway observe that the course of action indicated by the first respondent is not feasible of compliance. It has been held that a bare suit for declaration that a person has not been heard for a certain number of years and that therefore, decree should be granted that he is presumed to have died is not maintainable. The consistent view of the courts has been that such a relief will not fall within the scope of Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 which provides for invoking the court's jurisdiction for obtaining declaration of status or right (2022 AIR (Ker) 52, 2022 (1) LW.32, 2008 (3) LW.531, ILR 1948 Bom 633, SA No.194 of 2008 (Allahabad High Court, AIR 2021 Chh 20, ILR 1928 All 678, ILR 1928 LAH 467 and Vol 32 CAL WN 1084).

3. The real difficulty appears to be the guidelines provided in G.O Ms No.478 Revenue and Disaster Management Department dated 29.09.2022 for issuance of legal heir certificate. It has been laid down therein that the applicant must enclose the death certificate of the deceased. In this case, the applicant is not in a position to produce death certificate. By invoking Section 108 of the Indian Evidence Act corresponding to Section 111 of BSA 2023, there can be a presumption of death but for issuing death certificate, date of death is necessary. There cannot be any presumption regarding the date of death [(2004) 10 SCC 131]. Since the death certificate must contain the date of death, the authorities cannot be expected to issue the same. But whether on this score, the applicant can be denied legal heir certificate is the moot point for consideration.

4. There is a well known legal maxim “Lex Non Cogit Ad Impossibilia” (Law does not compel a person to do that which he or she cannot possibly perform). The petitioner cannot obtain her father's death certificate. She is however entitled to invoke the presumption set out in Section 108 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (corresponding to Section 111 of BSA, 2023). The said provision is as follows :

    “108. Burden of proving that person is alive who has not been heard of for seven years

    When the question is whether a man is alive or dead, and it is proved that he has not been heard of for seven years by those who would naturally have heard of him if he had been alive, the burden of proving that he is alive is shifted to the person who affirms it.”

When the petitioner can invoke the statutory presumption, she must be able to avail its benefits. I have already noted that on the strength of the presumption, the petitioner cannot obtain death certificate. Insisting on production of death certificate would amount to calling upon the petitioner to do the impossible. The petitioner should therefore be allowed to apply for legal heirship certificate without being called upon to produce the death certificate. Ubi jus ibi remedium is a well known maxim. If there is right, there must be remedy. The petitioner cannot go to civil court for the reasons already mentioned. She must therefore be permitted to apply to the revenue authority for legal heirship certificate.

5. The Hon'ble Kerala High Court in Bindhu v. State of Kerala [2022 AIR (Kerala) 52] held that the revenue authority ought to issue legal certificate if the person concerned has no

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    Judicial Analysis

    AI

    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top