Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.V. Karthikeyan, J
Arun Kapur – Appellant
Versus
Anand S. Chabria – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. joint ownership and agreements regarding property. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. legal battles over ownership declared null and void. (Para 6 , 8 , 36) |
| 3. contentions on ownership and maintainability of suit. (Para 11 , 25 , 26) |
| 4. claims of unlawful possession and ownership rights. (Para 21 , 22 , 34) |
| 5. requirement for declaration of title in possession suits. (Para 27 , 40 , 41) |
| 6. possession handed over under construction agreements. (Para 28 , 49) |
| 7. final judgment dismissing the suit. (Para 56 , 57) |
JUDGMENT :
C.V. KARTHIKEYAN, J.
1. The suit had been filed for a direction against the first and second defendants to handover vacant possession of a flat '4-A' measuring about 2000 sq.ft., of super built up area in the fourth floor of the multistored building called “Ved Nivas” at No. 52, Taylor's Road, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010 to the plaintiff and for the costs of the suit.
2. During the pendency of the suit, a memo had been filed by the learned counsel for the plaintiff that the relief against the second defendant is not pressed since the second defendant, who was in possession of the aforementioned flat, had vacated.
3. In the plaint, it had been stated that the
A plaintiff must seek a declaration of title to recover possession when there is a cloud over ownership, as established in Anathula Sudhakar ruling. Failure to do so results in dismissal of the suit.
The appellate court reaffirmed that ownership claims based on adverse possession are invalid when prior leasehold rights are acknowledged, confirming the plaintiff's title over the property.
A suit for mere declaration of ownership without seeking relief of possession is not maintainable under Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act.
Civil Law - Civil Suit - Seeks rejection of plaint - Restoration of possession - When and from whom plaintiff came into lawful possession of the property, and entitlement of plaintiff to restoration ....
Civil Law – Civil Suit - Unregistered agreement to sell – Maintainability of suit - When and from whom plaintiff came into lawful possession of property, and entitlement of plaintiff to restoration o....
The court ruled that permissive possession does not confer title, affirming ownership of plaintiffs over property and their right to recover possession.
In a suit for permanent injunction, the plaintiff must establish possession; failure to contest evidence leads to confirmation of ownership and injunction.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
