Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI, J
N.K.Paneerselvam – Appellant
Versus
S.Azeemunissa Begum – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The appellant has filed this appeal against the Judgment and decree dated 09.08.2016 passed in O.S.No.5223 of 2013 by the learned XVIII Additional City Civil Judge, Chennai.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred to as they were ranked in the original suit.
3.The appellant is the plaintiff in suit O.S. No. 5223 of 2013 on the file of the XVIII Additional City Civil Court, Chennai. As the plaintiff, he filed a suit against eight defendants, seeking relief for the delivery of vacant possession of the suit property after the removal of the superstructure at their cost. He also sought a declaration that he is the absolute owner of the suit property as per the sale deed, Document No. 3574 of 2018, along with a permanent injunction and other consequential reliefs.
4. The plaintiff claims ownership of the land, excluding the superstructure, based on his purchase from his vendor, the 8th defendant, 2\22 through a sale deed dated 05.12.2008. However, defendants 1 to 7 dispute the plaintiff's right and title, asserting that the plaintiff’s vendor had no ownership over the property. They contend that, since 1935, the mother-in- law of the 1st defendant, Fathima
The appellate court reaffirmed that ownership claims based on adverse possession are invalid when prior leasehold rights are acknowledged, confirming the plaintiff's title over the property.
Plaintiffs cannot simultaneously claim title through inheritance while asserting ownership via adverse possession; such claims are mutually exclusive.
The judgment establishes that continuous possession and proper documentation can affirm ownership, while claims of adverse possession require clear evidence and specific pleading.
to approach the Civil Court for adjudicating the title in issue and when the defendant's patta had been cancelled during 1995 merely on the production of certain electricity bills and house tax recei....
The defendants' denial of the plaintiff's title and their possession without paying rent after the lease period expired led the Court to conclude that the defendants were akin to trespassers and not ....
Plaintiff's subsisting title must be established to claim possession. Adverse possession claim requires fulfillment of specific requirements.
Long possession alone does not establish adverse possession; clear evidence of hostile intent against the rightful owner is required.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
