BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
B. PUGALENDHI, J.
S. Chelladurai - Petitioner
Versus
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Puliyangudi, Tenkasi and Anr. – Respondents
W.P. Crl.(MD) No.80 of 2025
Decided On : 06-06-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. request for police protection for cultural events. - What was the petitioner's request regarding the cultural events? (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. concerns about law and order by the police. - What concerns did the respondent express regarding permission? (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's evaluation of arguments from both sides. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. conditional approval of petition to conduct events. (Para 7) |
| 5. specific directions for the approval and compliance. (Para 8) |
ORDER :
(B. PUGALENDHI, J.)
The petitioner has approached this Court that his representation, seeking permission and police protection for conducting cultural events, Karakattam on 10.06.2025 and Adal Padal programme on 11.06.2025 in connection with Arulmigu Patira Kali Amman Kovil temple festival at Vasudevanallur, Tenkasi District, has not been considered by the respondents.
2. The petitioner claims that he is a Member of festival committee of Arulmigu Patira Kali Amman Kovil temple festival at Vasudevanallur, Tenkasi District and according to him, the villagers have decided to conduct cultural events, Karakattam on 10.06.2025 and Adal Padal programme on 11.06.2025 in connection with Arulmigu Patira Kali Amman Kovil temple festival and therefore, they have submitted a representation to the respondents on 02.06.2025. But, the same has not been considered by the respondents. Therefore, the present writ petition has been filed.
3. Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor takes notice for the respondents and submits that since there is a possibility of law and order problem, the 2nd respondent police has not considered the petitioner's representation.
4. In reply, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the festival is being conducted by the entire villagers and there is no possibility of any law and order problem. The petitioner also assures that the festival will be conducted without any law and order problem. In the event, if any law and order problem arises, the petitioner undertakes to take the responsibility for the same. That apart, the learned Counsel for the petitioner also submits that they are ready to do some social service to the Local Village Pancahayat, by paying a sum of Rs.25,000/- for the purpose of desilting a water body in the village.
5. This Court considered the rival submissions made by either side.
6. The petitioner's request for conducting the cultural programme in connection with the temple festival has not been considered by the 2nd respondent on the ground of law and order problem. However, the petitioner claims that there is no possibility of law and order problem and they will conduct the programme without any law and order problem. Moreover, the petitioner is prepared to pay a sum of Rs.25,000/- to the Local Village Pancahayat for the purpose of desilting a water body in the village.
7. Though this Court is not inclined to grant the relief as prayed for, considering the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner and also considering the undertaking given by the petitioner that he will be responsible for the law and order problem if any arises and the petitioner is prepared to do some social service by paying a sum of Rs.25,000/- to the Local Village Panchayat for the purpose of desilting a water body in the village, this Court is inclined to allow this writ petition, however, the cultural programme is restricted for one day on 11.06.2025.
8. Accordingly, this writ petition is partly allowed with the following directions:-
i. The petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) to the Local Village Pancahayat for the purpose of desilting a water body in the village.
ii.The petitioner shall also file an affidavit before the respondent Police with the following undertaking:

iii. The festival committee shall use the sound amplifier system and maintain the sound decibel level within the permissible limits.
iii.On filing of such undertaking affidavit and on production of receipt of payme
The court can permit cultural events with conditions to ensure public safety, balancing community interests and law enforcement concerns.
The court held that community festivals can proceed under the petitioner's responsibility for law and order, conditional on cooperation with local authorities.
Judicial discretion can override administrative denials of public event permissions when community assurances are provided against potential law and order issues.
Balancing individual rights for cultural expression with public interest and law enforcement concerns is critical in writ jurisdiction.
Court affirmed long-standing local tradition for event conduct over police concerns of law and order when assurances are provided.
Customary celebrations should be upheld unless substantial evidence of potential disruption exists, emphasizing timely consideration of requests for police permission.
Traditional cultural programs should not be denied without substantial evidence of potential law and order issues, emphasizing the importance of cultural heritage.
Traditional cultural celebrations must be respected, and police must consider requests for such events reasonably and within a specified timeframe.
Traditional cultural events should be permitted unless substantial law and order concerns are evidenced, emphasizing timely police consideration of requests for protection.
The court has the authority to grant permission for cultural programmes with specific conditions to ensure public order and harmony.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.