BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
B. Pugalendhi, J.
Malaimegu - Petitioner
Versus
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai Sub Division and ors. - Respondents
W.P.Crl.(MD) No.176 of 2025
Decided On : 13-06-2025
ORDER :
B. Pugalendhi, J.
The petitioner has approached this Court that his representation, seeking permission for conducting Adal Padal Programme on 13.06.2025 in connection with the temple festival of Arulmigu Sri Sundavaliyan Kovil, has been rejected by the 2nd respondent, on the ground of law and order problem.
2. The petitioner claims that he is a Member of festival committee of Arulmighu Sri Sundavaliyan Kovil and according to him, the villagers have decided to conduct Adal Padal programme on 13.06.2025 in connection with the temple festival of Arulmigu Sri Sundavaliyan Kovil and therefore, they have submitted a representation to the 2nd respondent. However, the 2nd respondent, by order dated 10.06.2025, rejected their request. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court.
3. Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor takes notice for the respondents and submits that since there is a possibility of law and order problem, the 2nd respondent police has not granted any permission to the petitioner.
4. In reply, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the festival is being conducted by the entire villagers and there is no possibility of any law and order problem. The petitioner also assures that the festival will be conducted without any law and order problem. In the event, if any law and order problem arises, the petitioner undertakes to take responsibility for the same. That apart, the learned Counsel for the petitioner also submits that they are ready to do some social service to the Local Village Pancahayat, by paying a sum of Rs.25,000/- for the purpose of desilting a water body in the village.
5. This Court considered the rival submissions made by either side.
6. The petitioner's request for conducting the cultural programme in connection with the temple festival was rejected by the 2nd respondent on the ground of law and order problem. However, the petitioner claims that there is no possibility of law and order problem and they will conduct the programme without any law and order problem. Moreover, the petitioner is prepared to pay a sum of Rs.25,000/- to the Local Village Pancahayat for the purpose of desilting a water body in the village.
7. Though this Court is not inclined to grant the relief as prayed for, considering the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner and also considering the undertaking given by the petitioner that he will be responsible for the law and order problem if any arises and the petitioner is prepared to do some social service by paying a sum of Rs.25,000/- to the Local Village Panchayat for the purpose of desilting a water body in the village.
8.Accordingly, the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.No.06/Ka.Aa/Ilai/Siva.U.Co/Siva/2025 dated 10.06.2025 is hereby set aside and this writ petition is allowed with the following directions:-
i. The petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) to the Local Village Pancahayat for the purpose of desilting a water body in the village.
ii.The petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) to the 2nd respondent Police for police protection.
iii.The petitioner shall also file an affidavit before the respondent Police with the following undertaking:




iv. On filing of such undertaking affidavit and on production of receipt of payment to the Village Panchayat and on payment of Rs.10,000/- for police protection, the second respondent Police shall grant permission for conducting the Adal Padal programme on 13.06.2025, as per the circular of the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu/Head of State Police Force, Chennai-4, in Rc.No. 007301/General I(I)/2019, dated 09.04.2019.
v. The respondent Police shall ensure that the amount of Rs.25,000/- paid by the petitioner to the Local Village Panchayat is used for desilting a water body in the Village.
vi. The Special Officer of the Village Panchayat and the second respondent Police shall file a report before this Court as
Judicial discretion can override administrative denials of public event permissions when community assurances are provided against potential law and order issues.
Balancing individual rights for cultural expression with public interest and law enforcement concerns is critical in writ jurisdiction.
The court can permit cultural events with conditions to ensure public safety, balancing community interests and law enforcement concerns.
The court held that community festivals can proceed under the petitioner's responsibility for law and order, conditional on cooperation with local authorities.
Court affirmed long-standing local tradition for event conduct over police concerns of law and order when assurances are provided.
Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus granted to quash police order rejecting permission to hold cultural program, if held with peaceful observance of law and order.
High Court can direct grant of permission for cultural event when petitioner undertakes peace; refusal solely on anticipated law and order concerns invalid.
The court upheld the right to conduct customary cultural events, emphasizing timely police responses to requests for permissions to prevent unnecessary litigation.
The court affirmed the right to conduct traditional cultural events, emphasizing timely police consideration of permission requests while ensuring public order.
Cultural events with a history of peaceful conduct should not be denied by police without substantial justification, and timely consideration of requests is essential.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.