Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.N. Manjula
G.Krithika – Appellant
Versus
S.P.Chitra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. execution of promissory note and legal status. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. defendants contest claim and raise signatures issue. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 3. issues framed in trial. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. arguments by both parties on the evidence. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. initial burden of proof and presumption in claims. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. application of evidentiary statutes. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 7. distinction between withholding and choosing evidence. (Para 16 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 8. role of expert evidence and its admissibility. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 9. rebuttal obligations of the defendants. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 10. court’s discretion on expert evidence. (Para 27 , 28) |
| 11. conclusion on appeal outcomes. (Para 29 , 30) |
JUDGMENT :
R.N. Manjula, J.
The defendants are the appellants in the second appeal. The respondent / plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of money based on the suit promissory note dated 28.10.2011 said to have been executed for a sum of Rs.7,00,000/-. The respondent / plaintiff has pleaded that one Ramachandran had borrowed a sum of Rs.7,00,000/- from the plaintiff on 28.10.2011 and executed the promissory note on the same date in favour of the plaintiff and she agreed to repay the same with interest @ 18%
When a promissory note's execution is denied, the onus of proof shifts to the claimant, negating initial presumption unless credible evidence of execution is presented.
The courts affirmed the validity of a promissory note based on direct evidence, emphasizing that expert testimony is weak and should not override substantive evidence.
The court emphasized that ocular evidence, such as the testimony of witnesses, can outweigh the opinion of a handwriting expert. The court held that the plaintiff's evidence, including the validity o....
The appellate court found the promissory note invalid due to lack of consideration and conflicting evidence, leading to the dismissal of the plaintiff's suit.
Expert opinion – Power to seek expert opinion under Section 45 of Evidence Act, 1872 is discretionary and depends on facts of each case – Courts can refuse expert opinion only when no doubt exists re....
The burden of proof lies with the Plaintiff to establish the execution and validity of the promissory note, and the Court can compare signatures to determine authenticity.
The presumption of consideration under Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act applies once execution of the promissory note is established, placing the burden on the Defendant to rebut this pr....
The presumption of execution in promissory notes under the Negotiable Instruments Act outweighs claims of fabrication by the defendant without substantial evidence.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
