Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
K.MURALI SHANKAR
Jenbagalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. petitioner's defense and arguments regarding age validity (Para 7 , 8 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. arguments relating to the doctor's alleged negligence. (Para 9) |
| 4. legal principles regarding medical negligence and pocso act (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 26 , 27) |
| 5. prosecution claims and defenses regarding actions at the hospital (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. final legal conclusions and implications on medical professionals (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 7. final decision on quashing the proceedings against the petitioner. (Para 33) |
ORDER:
K. MURALI SHANKAR, J.
“Medical profession is a noble profession, dedicated to the service of humanity.
A Doctor's reputation is a valuable asset, any false or malicious complaint can cause irreparable harm to their reputation and career.”
-Hon'ble Supreme Court of India
The Criminal Original Petition has been filed, invoking Section 528 B.N.S.S., seeking orders to call for the records pertaining to the FIR in Crime No.1 of 2024 pending on the file of the All Women Police Station, Srirangam, Tiruchirappalli District and quash the same as against the petitioner.
2. On the basis of the complai
Medical practitioners cannot be held liable under the POCSO Act without substantial evidence proving knowledge of the victim's age and alleged crimes. Quashing of FIR emphasizes protection against fa....
It is high time for society to preserve sanctity of medical profession and to uphold dignity of Doctors to ensure continued provision of exceptional care, innovation and dedication to saving lives.
A doctor cannot be held criminally liable under the POCSO Act for failing to report a minor's pregnancy if the victim misrepresents her age as 18 years, and mere suspicion is insufficient for prosecu....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for compliance with the provisions of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act and the protection afforded to medical practitioners for ac....
The court ruled that evidence did not establish medical negligence by the appellant, who acted in good faith under the MTP Act, leading to acquittal under Section 312 of IPC while being previously ac....
Prompt and Proper Reporting – Prompt and proper reporting of the commission of offence under the POCSO Act is of utmost importance and its failure on coming to know about the commission of any offenc....
The necessity of obtaining expert medical opinion before taking cognizance against a doctor in cases of alleged medical negligence is paramount to avoid wrongful prosecution.
Criminal liability under the POCSO Act requires a deliberate omission to report a crime, which was not established in this case.
Criminal proceedings against doctor quashed absent gross negligence proof and where inquiry report confirms no involvement in treatment; high threshold per established guidelines required for medical....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
