SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 4706

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS 
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.
Prof. Dr.R.Manonmani - Appellant 
Versus 
The State of Tamil Nadu - Respondent
Writ Petition Nos.26560, 31048, 31109 & 31335 of 2024 & WMP.Nos.29067, 33667, 33669, 33753, 33754, 33994, 33995 & of 2024
Decided on : 26-02-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.G.Sankaran, SC for Mr.B.Nedunchezhiyan, Mr.Isaac Mohanlal, Mr.K.Nishanth
For the Respondent: Mr.P.S.Raman, AG assisted by Mrs.M.Sneha, Mr.Adinarayana Rao, Mr.V.Kadhirvelu, Mr.V.P.Sarathi, Ms.T.Divya, Mr.Dinuprashanth

Administrative delays should not prejudice candidates’ rights to promotion when eligibility is established, emphasizing procedural fairness and adherence to seniority in selections.

Headnote:(A) Tamil Nadu Medical Service Rules - Notification of the National Medical Commission dated 14.02.2022 regarding qualifications for Deans - The Government Order in G.O.

(D) No.1044 dated 03.10.2024 challenged for unlawful promotion of seniority disregarding established qualifications including at least five years of service as a Professor required as of 15.03.2024. (Paras 26-30)

(B) Administrative Law - Procedural fairness - The petitioners, though eligible based on seniority, were denied promotion due to delays not attributable to them, violating the principle that no person should suffer for an act of court. (Paras 35-40)

(C) Court's Discretion - Court determined that delay in promotion should not prejudice the petitioners' right to be included in the Dean's selection panel for 2024-2025 despite failure to meet five years of experience due to administrative delays. (Paras 42-48)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners, Professors in specific medical fields, claimed promotion to Dean positions, contending that delays in their promotions were due to court and administrative actions. The official respondents promoted juniors despite the petitioners' seniority and eligibility based on CML rankings.

Findings of Court:
The Court held that the official respondents’ reliance on procedural rules was flawed as the petitioners' eligibility must again be considered underlined by the delay in their promotions not being their fault.

Issues: The core issue was the denial of promotion despite the petitioners' equal eligibility and seniority due to timing discrepancies and procedural delays.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that the principles of justice and fairness dictated that administrative delays should not negatively impact the candidates who participated in the promotional counseling and were otherwise qualified.

Result: The writ petitions were allowed, setting aside the impugned Government Order and mandating promotion to the petitioners to the post of Dean within four weeks.

Table of Content
1. legal standing of professors seeking promotion. (Para 1 , 4 , 8 , 10)
2. court's directive concerning petitioners' inclusion in promotions. (Para 9 , 11 , 49)
3. claims against government decisions regarding promotions. (Para 17 , 19 , 20)
4. delay considerations and their impact on eligibility. (Para 22 , 32 , 36)
5. judicial review of administrative decisions. (Para 26 , 37 , 42)

ORDER :

N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.

These writ petitions have been filed by the Professors working in the Specialities of (i) Obstetrics and Gynaecology; (ii) General Surgery and (iii) Orthopaedics, who were aspiring for promotion and selection to the post of Dean and were deprived of the same by virtue of the Government Order in G.O.(D) No.1044 Health and Family Welfare (A1) Department dated 03.10.2024 issued by the first respondent, questioning the promotion of the private respondents as Deans of various Government Medical Colleges and for a consequential direction to the official respondents to give promotion to the petitioners as Deans by placing them at the appropriate position in the panel for the year 2024-2025 to the post of Dean in the Government Medical Colleges as per their seniority in the Civil Medical List (CML).

2. Heard the respective learned counsel appearing on behalf of both parties.

3. Initially, W.P.No.26560 of 2024 came to be filed by the two petitioners seeking a direction to the official respondents to consider the inclusion of their names in the 2024-2025 panel for the post of Dean consequent upon the promotion counselling conducted on 26.2.2019 and in accordance with the subsequent proceedings of the second respondent dated 05.7.2024.

4. W.P.No.26560 of 2024 came to be disposed of by an order dated 12.9.2024 in the following terms :

“3. The case of the petitioners is that the petitioners 1 & 2 are working as Associate Professors from 2013 onwards. Subsequently, a promotion counselling was conducted on 26.02.2019 and the order of promotion for the post of Professor was issued on 03.05.2019 and both the petitioners joined the post of Professor on 15.05.2019 and 13.05.2019 respectively.

4. The State Government issued orders in G.O.(4D). No.2, dated 15.02.2019 to streamline the teaching post in the Government Medical Colleges and Hospitals under the control of DME by sanctioning the post matrix for Speciality Department in every Government Medical Colleges and attached institutions. Accordingly, the Government directed conducting promotional counselling for the post of Professor after the completion of the transfer counselling subject to the availability of the vacancies and preparation of panel.

5. In the light of the above G.O, circulars were issued by the 2nd respondent dated 22.02.2019 and 24.02.2019 to conduct promotional counselling for all the Speciality Departments for promotion to the post of Professors. In so far as the petitioners are concerned, since they were fully qualified and completed three years of service in the post of Associate Professor, there were allowed to participate in the promotional counselling conducted on 26.02.2019. The further case of the petitioners is that the Dean of a Medical College is an Administrative Post coming under the common pool and the feeder post for the same is the post of Professor and the seniority is taken into consideration in the CML in all the Speciality Departments.

6. The Government issued letter dated26.06.2024 through which the 2nd respondent was directed to include the name of the Medical Officers promoted as Professors in different Speciality Departments including the OG Department for whom promotion order for the post of Professors was delayed in the year 2019. This happened due to the pendency of some writ petitions and also the following pandemic.

7. The 1st respondent passed orders on 26.06.2024 followed by the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 05.07.2024 for rectification of the discrepancies in the matter of eligibility out of all medical officers who were

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top