BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
N.Seshasayee, P.Vadamalai
Siva @ Sivalingam – Appellant
Versus
State represented by The Assistant Commissioner of Police – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court’s detailed observations and analysis (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
JUDGMENT :
N. SESHASAYEE, J.
This Criminal Appeal is preferred by A1 to A3 in S.C.No.25 of 2005 on the file of the Court of II Additional District Judge (PCR), Tirunelveli, challenging the conviction as well as the sentence imposed on them. The details are as below:
| A1 to A3 | Conviction for offences | Sentence |
| 341 IPC | 1 month SI - Fine Rs.500 default 2 weeks SI each | |
| 307 r/w 34 IPC r/w 3(2)(v) of SC/ST (POA) Act (3 counts) | Life imprisonment – Fine Rs.500/- default 1 year SI each | |
| 3(a) of Explosive Substance Act (3 Counts) | 10 years RI – Fine Rs.500/- default 1 year SI each | |
| 4 of TNPPDL Act | 2 years RI – Fine Rs.500/- default 6 months SI each | |
| 3(i)(x) of SC/ST (POA) Act | 1 year RI – Fine Rs.500/- default 3 months SI each |
2.1 The case of the prosecution will be narrated in two parts :
a) that relates to the occurrence of a crime and the motive for it; and
b) that which relates to investigation.
A. Occurrence & the Motive for the Occurrence:
3.1 The motive for the crime in which life of P.W.20 was targeted for the attack, is that P.W.20 and his associates (who were examined as witnesses) were dalits, and that the accused persons w
Bhagwan Jagannath Marked Vs State of Maharashtra
Ravasaheb alias Ravasahebgouda & Others Vs State of Karnataka
The prosecution failed to establish the identity and involvement of the appellants in the crime beyond a reasonable doubt due to inconsistencies in witness testimony and procedural flaws.
The conviction based on unreliable witness testimony and unproven motive and conspiracy led to the overturning of the judgment, highlighting the necessity for credible evidence in criminal cases.
The court upheld the conviction for murder based on credible eyewitness accounts, asserting that discrepancies did not undermine the prosecution's case.
The eyewitness testimonies were credible and sufficient to establish the guilt of the appellants. The lack of a certificate under Section 65-B of the Indian Evidence Act rendered the CCTV footage ina....
Point of Law : Any outsider or stranger committing a crime of murder, in which event, identification of assailant becomes very critical and crucial but in light of evidences as brought on record, ide....
Eyewitness testimony, even from an interested witness, can sustain a conviction if corroborated by credible evidence and circumstances.
Prosecution must substantiate charges with reliable evidence; significant discrepancies in witness statements and medical evidence warrant acquittal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.