Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
N.ANAND VENKATESH
Ultimate Computer Care – Appellant
Versus
S.M.K.Systems – Respondent
ORDER :
N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.
These criminal original petitions have been filed to quash the proceedings pending in C.C.Nos.122, 123, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135 and 136 of 2022, on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukotai.
2. The respondent in each quash petition has filed a private complaint against the petitioners for offence under Section 138 of the “Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881” (hereinafter referred to as the “NI Act” for brevity) on the ground that the respondent has supplied materials to the petitioners and there was an enforceable liability towards which cheques were issued and when these cheques were presented, it was dishonored with endorsement “exceeds arrangement”. Thereafter, legal notice was issued and in some cases it was refused and in other cases, it was received and no reply notice was given nor the cheque amount was paid. The same resulted in the filing of individual private complaints which have been put to challenge in these quash petitions.
3. When the matter came up for hearing on 31.01.2025, this Court passed the following order:
“The main ground that was urged by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the subject cheques were alleg
Endorsement of part-payments on cheques is essential for them to represent a legally enforceable debt under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act; otherwise, dishonor does not constitute an o....
The court established that the issuance of a cheque, even if post-dated or issued as security, can constitute a legally enforceable debt under Sec. 138 of the N.I. Act, and that the inquiry under Sec....
The legal presumption under Section 139 of the NI Act favors the complainant, and factual disputes must be resolved at trial, not pre-trial.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for specific averments to establish vicarious liability under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and the court's power ....
(1) In a case tried summarily in which accused does not plead guilty, it is sufficient for Magistrate to record substance of evidence and deliver a judgment, containing a brief statement of reasons f....
Payment of a part or whole of the sum represented on a cheque between the period when the cheque is drawn and when it is encashed upon maturity reduces the legally enforceable debt on the date of mat....
Issuance of summons without conducting inquiry under Section 202 of the Cr.P.C. is impermissible, making the cognizance under Section 138 of the N.I. Act unsustainable.
A legal notice under Section 138 must clearly state the cheque amount due; a vague demand fails to meet legal requirements, rendering the complaint invalid.
(1) Dishonour of cheque – A post-dated cheque issued after debt has been incurred would be covered by definition of ‘debt’ – However, if sum payable depends on a contingent event, then it takes colou....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
