SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 4731

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ANITA SUMANTH, C. KUMARAPPAN, JJ.
Kasturba Gandhi Kanya Gurukulam Vedaranyam, Rep. By its Trustee, S. Chockalingam - Appellant 
Versus 
The Government of Tamil nadu Rep. By its Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Disaster Management and Ors. - Respondents
W.A. Nos. 2322 & 2323 of 2023 And C.M.P. Nos. 6043, 10053 of 2025, 26003, 26007 of 2024 & 19810 & 19814 of 2023
Decided On : 03-06-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. R. Singaravelan, Senior Counsel For Mr. P. Jagadeesan.
For the Respondents:Mr. J. Ravindran, Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr. A. Selvendran, Special Government Pleader, Mr. V. Raghavachari, Senior Counsel For Mr. V. Kasinatha Bharathi, Mr. S. Senthilnathan.

The court reaffirmed that longstanding possession and documentation can establish title over land, directing compliance with acquisition procedures for public projects while upholding historical claims.

Headnote:(A) Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Sections 5 to 8 and 11 - Claim of ownership and possession over lands acquired in 1957 by Kasturba Gandhi Kanya Gurukulam was upheld, rejecting State's position of encroachment on government land. (Paras 7, 9, 19 and 78)

(B) Public Interest vs. Private Ownership - The necessity for a public bus stand was acknowledged, with the court directing the state to initiate land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act while recognizing the Gurukulam's historical claim. (Paras 80, 81)

Facts of the case:
KGK Gurukulam, established in 1946 to provide education to underprivileged girls, claimed ownership of lands based on an award from 1957, while the State argued that the land had reverted as government property.

Findings of Court:
The court affirmed Gurukulam's ownership citing long-term possession and lack of timely dispute from the State, directing acquisition process for vacant land for public use.

Issues: Key issues included the validity of the original land award and the maintainability of the writ petitions challenging state claims on land ownership.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that long-standing possession and documented awards provided sufficient grounds for rights to the land, overruling recent state claims deemed unsubstantiated after decades.

Result: Writ Appeals allowed with directions for timely government action.

Table of Content
1. establishment and purpose of kgk gurukulam. (Para 1 , 2)
2. writ petitions regarding land acquisition. (Para 3 , 4)
3. appellant's claims of ownership and possession. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 12 , 16 , 19)
4. state's denial of ownership and related arguments. (Para 20 , 22 , 24 , 28 , 31 , 35)
5. assessment of maintainability of the writ petitions. (Para 49 , 50 , 63)
6. validity of the 1957 award. (Para 68 , 77 , 78)
7. conclusion and directions for acquisition process. (Para 81 , 82)

JUDGMENT :

(ANITA SUMANTH, J.)

Kasturba Gandhi Kanya Gurukulam (appellant/KGK Gurukulam/Gurukulam) was established in 1946 at Vedaranyam by Sardar Vedarathinam, a Freedom Fighter and Gandhian. The object was to provide education along with board and lodge to girls who were economically unable to afford the same.

2. As on the date when the matter was closed for hearing, the KGK Gurukulam manages the following institutions and facilities.

1. Kasturba Gandhi Kanya Gurukulam Elementary School.

2. Kasturba Gandhi Kanya Gurukulam Girls Higher Secondary School.

3. Kasturba Gandhi Kanya Gurukulam Girls Destitute Children Home.

4. Goshala (Shelter for cattle, aiding in the Gurukulam's Self- sustenance Programs).

5. Kasturba Gandhi Kanya Gurukulam B.Ed College for Women.

6. Social Welfare Board aided Printing and Electronics Training Schools for Women.

7. Annappornalayam Charity Kitchen that provides free food to students and residents.

8. Lady staff quarters for women employees working with the Gurukulam.

9. Playgrounds for the Girls school and college

10. Bathroom and toilet facilities with biogas plant for adolescent girls (located within 200 Meters of the proposed Government construction site).

11. Separate bathroom and toilet blocks specifically for the women's B.Ed college

3. Two Writ Petitions were filed by the appellant, (i) W.P.No5141 of 2023, wherein the prayer was for a mandamus directing the Tahsildar, Vedaranyam/R6 to conduct an enquiry as per the direction issued by the Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO), Nagapattinam in R.C.2665/B3 dated 20.10.2021 in respect of the title to the land for which patta had been granted by R6 in proceedings No.K.Dis.13337/87 B5 dated 13.06.1988 and (ii) W.P.No.6782 of 2023 seeking a certiorarified mandamus challenging the display of a poster on 27.01.2023 /14.02.2023 on the compound wall of the land in S.Nos.632-10, 633, 634 and 635-1 in Maharajapuram Keezhpathi Village (in short ‘lands in question’) to the effect that the aforesaid lands belonged to Vedaranyam Municipality.

4. In the latter Writ Petition, the appellant had sought a direction to the respondents to adhere to, and follow the procedure for acquisition as per Sections 5 to 8 and 11 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (in short ‘2013 Act’) for identification and procurement of land for public processes.

5. Both the Writ Petitions came to be dismissed on 25.07.2023, as against which the present Writ Appeals have been filed. The array of parties in the Writ Appeals are identical to that of the Writ Petitions, except that O.S.Manian, s/o. Somu and V.Baskaran, s/o. Vaithiyanathan, Joint Secretary, Parents-Teachers Association have been impleaded as R7 and R8 in W.A.No.2322 of 2023 and R8 and R9 in W.A.No.2323 of 2023.

6. Mr.R.Singaravelan, learned Senior Counsel appearing for Mr.P.Jagadeesan, learned counsel on record for the appellant assails the process by which the respondents have sought to trespass into the properties belonging to KGK Gurukulam, as, according to the appellant, those properties have been acquired specifically for the purpose of Gurukulam as early as in 1957 by way of Award bearing No.7 of 1957 dated 15.10.1957 issued by the Sub-Collector, Nagapattinam (Award).

7. He would submit that the process of acquisition culminating in passing of an award in favour of the appellant was in line with the procedure contemplated at the relevant point in time. The lands have been a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top