IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
DINESH KUMAR SINGH, J.
Sharad Kumar Dwivedi - Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. and Ors. - Respondents
Public Interest Litigation (PIL) No. 7472 of 2021
Decided On : 05-07-2022
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 409 - U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 - Section 34, 117(6) - U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, 1950 - Section 117(6) - U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 - Section 101 –Indian Trust Act, 1882 - Sections 51, 52 and 53 - Power of High court to issue writs - Criminal breach of trust by public servant, or by banker, merchant or agent - Whether in said land bhumidhari rights could have been created by transferring the said land in favour of a private person headed by a retired IAS officer – Held, State holds natural resources such as land, forests, minerals etc on behalf the citizens of this country in trust – State authorities can not allow natural resources going in hands of unscrupulous persons who have money and muscle power or have influence in State machinery – If one undertakes a case study regarding wealth in the hands of people who have enjoyed power or in power, startling facts would come out that how people with absolutely no means or with limited means once occupied power became rich/super rich and without any known source of income from calling or profession live Maharaja lifestyle in palace like houses – Once these people reach to power, they create enormous wealth for themselves not by legal and justified means but by corruption and taking control of scarce and valuable natural resources by their influence over administration – This Court cannot shut its eyes to this alarming phenomenon – New kind of Maharajas and princes have prop up after independence who could or have reached to power even for short period – People are not pursuing merit as they find that merit is not recognised in this country – They believe that to earn wealth and power, one should enter politics – Politics is no longer a public service but a means to achieve power and wealth – This phenomenon must be reversed if democracy has to survive in this country and society is to be governed by rule of law – Unscrupulousness must be eschewed – Merit is to be recognised and respected –Writ petition allowed.
JUDGMENT :
Writ Petition:-
1. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed against the alleged illegal, arbitrary and mala fide resumption of the Gram Sabha land comprising in Gata Nos.467, 468, 509, 554 (new nos.842, 1034, 1039, 1040 and 1175), measuring 3 acres situated in Village Nanakganj Grant, Pargana Gopmau, Tehsil Sadar, District Hardoi for a private trust created by one Radhey Shyam Agarwal, a retired IAS officer, father of Sanjeev Agarwal, opposite party no.5, by the then District Magistrate, Hardoi vide order dated 30.1.1987. It has been prayed in the writ petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus to opposite parties-authorities to hold an independent inquiry into the matter and a direction has been sought for removal of unauthorized/illegal constructions of Maruti Car showroom of Concept Cars Limited over the said land.
Facts of the Case:
2. A private Trust namely, Gyan Yog Charitable Trust was created by late Radhey Shyam Agarwal on 10.9.1986. This Trust was said to have been created for charitable purposes. Main objects of the Trust were to provide help to poor people in education, medical relief and free accommodation and assistance to the travellers, providing food to the deserving people, advancement of Indian culture and literature, rural developmental etc. The Trust was settled with Rs.5,000/- which was the corpus of fixed property of the Trust. Radhey Shyam Agarwal became the first Managing Trustee and the Chairman of the Board of Trustees.
3. The revenue record before the consolidation operation was undertaken in the village, would suggest that in khatauni of 1333 Fasli (Year 1926) the lands of khata no.178 comprising of old plot nos.508, 509, 567, 544/1 (new plot nos.1034, 1035, 1039, 1040, 1175) were rerecorded as ''Jangal Dhak' in clause (5)(iii)(b)(2) of the Land Record Manual. Thus, the lands were public utility lands vested in Gaon Sabha. In 1356 Fasli (Year 1949) also the lands in the aforesaid gata numbers were recorded as ''Jangal Dhak'. The then District Magistrate, Hardoi resumed the said land for late Radhey Shyam Agarwal, a retired IAS officer purportedly in exercise of powers conferred under sub-section (6) of Section 117 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as U.P.ZA & LR Act) vide order dated 30.1.1987. It was said that the said order dated 30.1.1987 was passed in partial embellishment of the Government Order dated 16.6.1981. The total land resumed in the aforesaid gata numbers was 4-16-8 (three acres) for the Trust. The said transaction was reflected in Khata No.363 of Khatauni of 1395 Fasli. It was said that Radhey Shyam Agarwal deposited premium amount of Rs.24,000/-. After the land was transferred in the name of Radhey Shyam Agarwal, the said land was given on lease by him for annual rent of Rs.250/- in favour of Indresh Charan Das for 99 years. A school building was constructed for imparting education upto Class-VIII. It was also said that a small charitable hospital was also constructed and there was a Homeopathy Dispensary, 10 bedded Allopathy hospital which came up on the said land.
4. After death of Radhey Shyam Agarwal, vide order dated 23.10.1999, Tehsildar, Sadar, Hardoi in Case No.207 under Section 34 of the Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901 directed substitution of name of his eldest son, Rajeev Agarwal. In the khatauni of 1412-1417 Fasli Year, name of Rajeev Agarwal S/o Radhey Shyam Agarwal, President of the Gyan Yog Charitable Trust got recorded against the said land.
5. It is also relevant to note here that as per official version there is no record available regarding mutation of the name of Sanjeev Agarwal, opposite party no.5, S/o Radhey Shyam Agarwal. Despite no order on record in respect of mutation of name of Sanjeev Agarwal in place of Rajeev Agarwal, Sanjeev Agarwal, opposite party no.5 sold the land of Khata No.657 in Gata Nos.842M/0.0370 hectares and 1175/0.1260 hectares, total 0.1530
Akhil Bhartiya Upbhokta Congress Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Gyanendra Singh Vs. Additional Commissioner, Agra Division, Agra
Jagpal Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and others
M.I. Builders (P) Ltd. Vs Radhey Shyam Sahu
Friends Colony Development Committee Vs. State of Orissa
The court affirmed that land recorded as Abadi under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, remains vested in the State, allowing for resumption under Section 117(6) despite claims ....
Fraudulent entries in revenue records do not confer legal rights; land designated as forest is public utility land and cannot be claimed without proper legal basis.
The court emphasized the limitations on land allotment to educational institutions under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, and the discretionary power of the State Government i....
All State Governments in the country that they should prepare schemes for eviction of illegal/unauthorised occupants of Gram Sabha/Gram Panchayat/poramboke/shamlat land and these must be restored to ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.