Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.SWAMINATHAN
J.Rajkumar – Appellant
Versus
Authorisation Committee (Transplantation) Rep. by Chairman, Coimbatore Medical College and Research – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioner is working as an Electrical Assistant in Indian Railways. He is aged about 30 years. He is suffering from chronic kidney disease. He is under dialysis. He has been advised by his nephrologist to undergo kidney transplant at the earliest. The petitioner's wife came forward to donate her organ. But it did not materialise on account of medical incompatibility. Offers made by other relatives also met the same fate. Seeing the petitioner's condition, Mrs.Radhika, W/o.Kuppan offered to donate her organ and she was found to be compatible. As she was not related, prior approval from the Authorisation Committee was required.
2. Accordingly, application in Form-11 was submitted by the prospective donor and the petitioner. Their case is that the offer by Mrs.Radhika is out of love and affection and there is no commercial element in the transaction. However, the application was rejected. Challenging the same, the present writ petition has been filed.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner reiterated all the contentions set out in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition and called upon this Court to grant relief as prayed for.
4. Per contra, the learned Gove
Natural justice principles mandate that applicants must be given an opportunity to explain their case, particularly in organ donation applications without evidence of commercial motives.
The court emphasized that kidney transplantation from non-near relatives requires the Authorisation Committee's prior approval to prevent commercial dealings, underscoring altruistic motives in organ....
Altruistic organ donations should not be rigidly restricted by familial definitions; the intent behind donation is critical for approval under the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act.
The court ruled that the rejection of an organ donation application based on suspected financial exploitation without adequate evidence is arbitrary, emphasizing that altruistic intent must be evalua....
The court emphasized that altruistic organ donations must not be denied based solely on financial disparities, requiring thorough evaluation by the Authorisation Committee to prevent arbitrary reject....
The court ruled that strict adherence to regulations is essential in kidney transplantation cases, particularly for non-related donors, to ensure genuine altruism and safety.
Point of law : There is no rule that, poor people can't donate organs. Being poor is not a sin. people with big hearts are there in plenty in our country and they can save them
The court mandated a reconsideration of the kidney donation application, emphasizing the importance of establishing altruism and ensuring due process in the hearing.
The court emphasized the necessity for independent decision-making by authorities in organ donation cases, mandating clear reasoning for rejections to uphold the right to life and health.
The authorities must provide clear reasoning for rejecting organ transplantation applications to ensure transparency and accountability, especially when health rights are at stake.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
