SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 2696

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.S.SUNDAR, N.SENTHILKUMAR
S.Anbarasan – Appellant
Versus
Hemalatha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Anil Sandeep

ORDER :

1. The Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 23.03.2020 made in SHRC Case No.9024/2018 passed by the seventh respondent/State Human Rights Commission with a prayer to quash the same.

2. The case of the Writ Petitioner is that he had preferred a complaint on 12.06.2018 against one Pouliya [who is not a party to SHRC proceedings] and others for spraying chilli powder and snatching his two mobile phones and all his belongings. The complaint preferred by him in Pappanadu Police Station was cognizable in nature. However, neither a case was registered nor CSR was issued based on the complaint preferred by him.

(a) According to the petitioner, the fifth respondent/Head Constable of Pappanadu Police Station, is a relative of Ms.Pouliya and he seems to be a very influential person. He pressurized the Writ Petitioner to withdraw the complaint against the said Pouliya. The Writ Petitioner had made a complaint to the higher officials and Chief Minister's Special Cell. There was no response. The Writ Petitioner contends that though he had preferred a complaint on 12.06.2018, the Pappanadu Police have not chosen to register FIR immediately after he filed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top