KALYAN RAI SURANA, SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Swati Bidhan Baruah D/o Supti Ranjan Baruah – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
K.R.Surana, J
Heard the petitioner-in-person, who is an advocate. Also heard Mr. D. Nath, learned Senior Govt. Advocate.
2) By filing this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has made two prayers, viz., (a) for directing the Deputy Commissioner of Police (West), Guwahati to conduct an enquiry and prejudice caused to the petitioner and to take disciplinary action against the second officer-in-charge for the same; and (b) to direct the Police Commissioner, being the head of Guwahati City Police to transfer the case to All Women Police Station for proper investigation of the same.
3) The petitioner projects herself to be a transgirl and by citing the decision of the Supreme Court of India in the case of National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India & Ors., (2014) 5 SCC 438, it has been submitted that she is entitled to be treated as a “third gender”.
4) It may be mentioned that on 07.09.2023, when the matter was called, the petitioner-in-person had made a prayer for in-camera hearing in the Judge’s Chamber as submissions made in the open Court may cause her some embarrassment. The in-camera hearing in Judge’s Chamber was refused, bu
Abdur Rahim v. State of Assam & Ors.
CBI v. State of Rajasthan and another
Godrej Sara Lee Ltd. V. The Excise and Taxation Officer- cum- Assessing Authority & Ors.
National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India & Ors.
Pasupuleti Siva Ramakrishna Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Ritu Chhabaria v. Union of India & Ors.
Sudhir Bhaskarrao Tambe v. Hemen Yashwant Dhage & Ors.
Sakiri Vasu v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P. & Others
State of Bihar v. A.C. Saldanna
The court emphasized the importance of thorough examination of allegations before transferring an investigation to CBI and highlighted the petitioner's failure to register an FIR or seek remedy under....
The court emphasized that allegations of human rights violations require substantial evidence, and procedural lapses alone do not constitute violations.
No authority can arrogate to itself the power to act in a manner which is arbitrary. It is unfortunate that matters which require immediate attention linger on and man in street is made to run from o....
The court upheld lower courts' discretion in denying FIR registration, ruling that the petitioner had sufficient evidence and means to substantiate his claims without police assistance.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.