SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 4937

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. Dhandapani, J.
R.Thiyagarajan - Appellant
Versus
Gunashree and ors. - Respondents
CMA.No.114 of 2025
Decided On : 24-01-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : M/s.P.T.Saleem Fathima for M/s.M.S.Elangovan Law Associates
For the Respondent: Mr.J.Chandran

The court modified the compensation awarded by the Tribunal, enhancing it from Rs.2,60,600/- to Rs.3,78,500/- due to errors in calculating disability compensation and other heads.

Headnote:(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 166 and 168 - Appeal against compensation awarded by Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal - The Tribunal found the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving, awarding Rs.2,60,600/- as compensation, which was challenged for being inadequate. (Paras 4, 10)

(B) Quantum of Compensation - The court found the Tribunal erred in calculating disability compensation at Rs.5,000/- per percentage instead of Rs.8,000/-, leading to an enhancement of the disability compensation to Rs.1,44,000/-. Other heads of compensation were also increased. (Paras 8, 10)

Facts of the case:
The appellant sustained multiple fractures and injuries in an accident on 06-01-2019 caused by the rash driving of the 1st respondent's vehicle, resulting in a claim for Rs.16,00,000/-. The Tribunal awarded Rs.2,60,600/- after trial.

Findings of Court:
The total compensation was modified and enhanced to Rs.3,78,500/- with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of claim petition.

Issues: The main issue was the adequacy of compensation awarded by the Tribunal, particularly regarding the calculation of disability and other heads.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the Tribunal's calculation of disability compensation was erroneous and should reflect the statutory amount, leading to an overall enhancement of the compensation awarded.

Result: Appeal allowed in part.

JUDGMENT :

M. Dhandapani, J.

Challenging the judgment and decree dated 30.01.2024 made in MCOP.No.1201 of 2019 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, III Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai, the claimant is before this Court.

2. Mr.J.Chandran, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the 2nd respondent. In view of the consent expressed by the learned counsel on either side, this appeal is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

3. Since the 1st respondent remained exparte before the trial court, notice to the 1st respondent is dispensed with.

4. It is the case of the appellant/claimant that, on 06-01-2019 at about 22:10 hours, when he was proceeding in Konnur High Road in a motorcycle bearing Regn.No.TN-01-AS-3019, from west to east direction and while proceeding near the junction of Railway Quarters Road, as the driver of the car bearing Regn.No.TN-05-AX-6363 owned by the 1st respondent insured with the 2nd respondent which was proceeding ahead of the appellant, drove the same in a very high speed and in a rash and negligent manner and suddenly took a left turn to enter the Railway Quarters without any indication and dashed against the above said motorcycle, due to which the appellant sustained multiple fractures and injuries and got admitted in the hospital. Thereby, the appellant filed a claim petition seeking compensation of Rs.16,00,000/-. Before the tribunal, the claimant examined himself as P.W.1 and marked exhibits P.1 to P.13 and on the side of respondents no documents were marked and no witness was examined and the Disability Certificate was marked as Court document Ex.C.1. After trial, the Tribunal, on appreciation of oral and documentary evidence, though came to a conclusion that the accident had taken place due to the rash and negligent driving on the part of the driver of the 1st respondent, however, awarded a meagre compensation of Rs.2,60,600/-. Challenging the same, the appellant has filed the present appeal.

5. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that, the above said accident occurred solely due to the rash and negligent driving on the part of the driver of the 1st respondent vehicle, due to which, the appellant sustained multiple fracture injuries all over his body and severe bleeding injuries and lacerated wounds all over his body and the medical board also assessed a permanent disability of 18%. However, the tribunal had taken only a sum of Rs.5,000/- per percentage of disability and awarded a meagre compensation under the head Disability and the compensation awarded under other heads are also on lower side and the same has to necessarily be enhanced. Accordingly, he prayed for appropriate orders.

6. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent/ Insurance Company submitted that, by considering all the relevant documents, the Tribunal has rightly awarded the compensation, which does not require any enhancement. Accordingly, he prayed for dismissal of the appeal.

7. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

8. The factum and manner of the accident is not disputed by the parties. Therefore, this Court is not entering into the said aspect. The major grievance of the appellant/claimant is with regard to the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal. It is claimed by the appellant that though the accident is of the year 2019, however, the Tribunal had taken a sum of Rs.5,000/- per percentage of disability. In this regard, this Court perused Ex.C.1, which is the disability certificate issued by the Medical Board and the same reveals that the appellant suffered disability of 18% and by erroneously adopting a sum of Rs.5,000/- per percentage of disability, the tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.90,000/-. However, as per the existing law at the relevant point of time, the Tribunal ought to have fixed a sum of Rs.8,000/- per percentage of disability. Hence, the amount under the head Disability stands enhanced to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top