IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. Dhandapani, J.
R.Thiyagarajan - Appellant
Versus
Gunashree and ors. - Respondents
CMA.No.114 of 2025
Decided On : 24-01-2025
JUDGMENT :
M. Dhandapani, J.
Challenging the judgment and decree dated 30.01.2024 made in MCOP.No.1201 of 2019 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, III Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai, the claimant is before this Court.
2. Mr.J.Chandran, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the 2nd respondent. In view of the consent expressed by the learned counsel on either side, this appeal is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
3. Since the 1st respondent remained exparte before the trial court, notice to the 1st respondent is dispensed with.
4. It is the case of the appellant/claimant that, on 06-01-2019 at about 22:10 hours, when he was proceeding in Konnur High Road in a motorcycle bearing Regn.No.TN-01-AS-3019, from west to east direction and while proceeding near the junction of Railway Quarters Road, as the driver of the car bearing Regn.No.TN-05-AX-6363 owned by the 1st respondent insured with the 2nd respondent which was proceeding ahead of the appellant, drove the same in a very high speed and in a rash and negligent manner and suddenly took a left turn to enter the Railway Quarters without any indication and dashed against the above said motorcycle, due to which the appellant sustained multiple fractures and injuries and got admitted in the hospital. Thereby, the appellant filed a claim petition seeking compensation of Rs.16,00,000/-. Before the tribunal, the claimant examined himself as P.W.1 and marked exhibits P.1 to P.13 and on the side of respondents no documents were marked and no witness was examined and the Disability Certificate was marked as Court document Ex.C.1. After trial, the Tribunal, on appreciation of oral and documentary evidence, though came to a conclusion that the accident had taken place due to the rash and negligent driving on the part of the driver of the 1st respondent, however, awarded a meagre compensation of Rs.2,60,600/-. Challenging the same, the appellant has filed the present appeal.
5. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that, the above said accident occurred solely due to the rash and negligent driving on the part of the driver of the 1st respondent vehicle, due to which, the appellant sustained multiple fracture injuries all over his body and severe bleeding injuries and lacerated wounds all over his body and the medical board also assessed a permanent disability of 18%. However, the tribunal had taken only a sum of Rs.5,000/- per percentage of disability and awarded a meagre compensation under the head Disability and the compensation awarded under other heads are also on lower side and the same has to necessarily be enhanced. Accordingly, he prayed for appropriate orders.
6. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent/ Insurance Company submitted that, by considering all the relevant documents, the Tribunal has rightly awarded the compensation, which does not require any enhancement. Accordingly, he prayed for dismissal of the appeal.
7. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.
8. The factum and manner of the accident is not disputed by the parties. Therefore, this Court is not entering into the said aspect. The major grievance of the appellant/claimant is with regard to the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal. It is claimed by the appellant that though the accident is of the year 2019, however, the Tribunal had taken a sum of Rs.5,000/- per percentage of disability. In this regard, this Court perused Ex.C.1, which is the disability certificate issued by the Medical Board and the same reveals that the appellant suffered disability of 18% and by erroneously adopting a sum of Rs.5,000/- per percentage of disability, the tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.90,000/-. However, as per the existing law at the relevant point of time, the Tribunal ought to have fixed a sum of Rs.8,000/- per percentage of disability. Hence, the amount under the head Disability stands enhanced to
The court modified the compensation awarded by the Tribunal, enhancing it from Rs.2,60,600/- to Rs.3,78,500/- due to errors in calculating disability compensation and other heads.
In determining compensation, courts may adjust awarded amounts based on the prevailing laws relating to disability and other compensatory factors.
Judicial review allows for compensation enhancement in motor accident claims when initial assessment is inadequate under statutory guidelines.
The court enhanced the awarded compensation for injuries based on insufficient initial valuations for disability, pain, suffering, and related expenses, emphasizing the need for fair compensation.
The court held that the compensation awarded for personal injury must reflect fair and just assessments of pain, suffering, and disability, emphasizing fairness in compensation in motor accident clai....
The court emphasized the need for fair assessment of disability and injury compensation, leading to enhanced compensation due to inadequacies in the initial award.
The court clarified that compensation for permanent disability must utilize the multiplier method, ensuring accurate reflection of future earnings and establishing clear guidelines for calculating da....
Compensation for injuries must align with statutory rates and accurately reflect the disability suffered, requiring necessary adjustments for just compensation.
Permanent disability compensation must accurately reflect medical assessments and consider various factors for a just award, adhering to multiplier methods.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.