SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 5108

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B.BALAJI
Jayanthi – Appellant
Versus
Pichapillai – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.T. Deeraj

Table of Content
1. petitioner's status and application details. (Para 1 , 2)
2. contention regarding unregistered sale deed. (Para 3)
3. precedents on unregistered documents for possession. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. trial court's dismissal and grounds. (Para 8 , 9)
5. conditions for using unstamped document. (Para 10)
6. final decision and order. (Para 11)

ORDER :

P.B. BALAJI, J.

Heard Mr.T. Deeraj, learned counsel for the petitioner. Despite service of notice on the respondent, the respondent has neither appeared in person, nor through a counsel.

2. The petitioner is the 5th defendant in O.S. No.83 of 2014. An application in I.A. No.2 of 2020 was taken out to mark an unregistered Sale Deed, dated 31.10.1988. The trial Court finding that the petitioner is attempting to establish title through the said document, proceeded to dismiss the application. Aggrieved by the said order, the present revision has been filed.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the said unregistered Sale Deed is sought to be marked as a document only in order to establish the factum of possession, more specifically the commencement of possession being with the 1st defendant and subsequently with the 5th defen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top