Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
K.MURALI SHANKAR
Senthilvelpandian – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Vickramasingapuram Police Station – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of property dispute. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. magistrate's dismissal of petition observed. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. petitioner's allegations of false evidence noted. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. cognizability issues under criminal procedure. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. court concludes revision case lacks merits. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
ORDER :
1. The Criminal Revision is directed against the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.1378 of 2024, dated 31.05.2024 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ambasamudram, dismissing the petition filed under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C.
2. The case of the petitioner/complainant is that his father Govindapandian has entered into a sale agreement with one Kulam Maideen and his wife Maboob Beevi in respect of the house property and vacant site situated in S.No.675 of V.K.Puram Part-I and subsequently, purchased the said property vide sale deed, dated 28.10.2004 after paying the valuable consideration; that his father had changed the tax assessment and was in possession and enjoyment of the same; that his father had then executed a Will, dated 25.11.2010 in favour of the petitioner's mother and after the death of his father on 06.12.2010 Will came into force and the pe
The court ruled that civil disputes regarding property do not constitute cognizable offences for criminal investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. when they are barred under the Code and pertain to....
The dismissal of a petition for investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. is justified when no cognizable offence is disclosed, aligning with the procedural requirements of Sections 195 and 340 Cr.P....
The obligation to discharge the accused under Section 239 Cr.P.C. arises when the Magistrate considers the charge against the accused to be groundless, and where material on record discloses offence,....
The decision confirms the legality of FIR registration under circumstances related to civil disputes, emphasizing the need for adherence to procedural laws.
The judgment established that a complaint related to the validity of a Settlement Deed did not constitute forgery as defined under Section 464 of the Indian Penal Code.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
