JUDGMENT :

G.JAYACHANDRAN, R.POORNIMA, JJ.

The appellants 1 and 2 are son and father. The trial Court found them guilty for offence under Section 34 1 IPC and sentenced them to undergo one month simple imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.500/-, in default, to undergo 15 days simple imprisonment. Also, as against A1, the court found him guilty for offence under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to undergo Life Imprisonment with fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default, to undergo 3 months rigorous imprisonment. Similarly, A2 was found guilty for offence under Section 302 read with 34 IPC and sentenced him to undergo Life Imprisonment with fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default, to undergo 3 months rigorous imprisonment.

2. The above said judgment rendered in S.C.No.85 of 2014 by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Sivagangai is under challenge in the present appeal. The grounds of appeal reads as under:-

The judgement of the trial Court is based only on presumption, surmise conjuncture. The Court below failed to appreciate the contradictions in respect of material facts. The testimony of PW1 and PW2 ought to have been rejected by the trial Court since they both are interested witness and