Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.NIRMAL KUMAR
K. Sivakumar, Rep. by his Power Agent Mr. R. Haneesh – Appellant
Versus
V. Shanmugasundram – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the loan and cheque dispute. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding the validity of the cheque and notice. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's analysis of the case and evidence. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. conclusion of the case - appeal dismissed. (Para 8 , 9) |
JUDGMENT :
M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.
The appellant as complainant filed a private complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as “NI Act”) against the respondent in C.C.No.6664 of 2013 before the learned Magistrate, Fast Track Court-III at Saidapet. The Trial Court by judgment dated 20.06.2018 convicted the respondent and sentenced him to undergo six months simple imprisonment and directed to pay the cheque amount of Rs.13,99,425/- as compensation. Aggrieved against the same, the respondent preferred an appeal before the learned V Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai. The Lower Appellate Court by judgment dated 10.10.2019 allowed the appeal setting aside the conviction of the Trial Court. Against which, the present appeal filed.
2.The complaint is that the respondent availed a loan of Rs.2,00,000/- from the complainant on 16.06.2008, again borrowed a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- on 19.01.20
A cheque may be dishonoured for insufficient funds, but if a debt is time barred and no supporting documents are presented, the defense may lead to acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instr....
A cheque issued for a time-barred debt does not constitute a legally enforceable debt under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, leading to no offence being committed.
The appellant failed to establish the existence of a loan to support the cheque under Section 138, and once the accused probablized his defence, the evidential burden shifted back to the complainant.
A cheque issued as security does not constitute a discharge of a legally enforceable debt under the NI Act.
A company can authorize an employee to file a complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act, and a signed blank cheque can create a presumption of liability unless rebutted by the accused.
Dishonour of cheque – When a cheque is issued towards a time-barred debt and is dishonoured, liability under Section 138 of N.I. Act squarely arises.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the impact of the loan agreement terms on the enforceability of debt under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
