Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SATHISH KUMAR, R.SAKTHIVEL
K. Venkatachalam – Appellant
Versus
K. Revathi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the agreements and transactions (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments of the appellant regarding loan transaction (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. issues framed by the trial court (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. court observations on agreements and execution (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. prohibited evidence regarding the agreements (Para 15 , 16) |
| 6. court's findings on repayment and entitlements (Para 18 , 19) |
| 7. final order and decree (Para 20 , 21) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Challenging the decree and judgment of the Trial Court decreeing the suit for specific performance to execute sale deed in favour of the plaintiff in respect of the suit property, the present appeal has been filed by the defendants.
2.a. It is the case of the plaintiff that the first defendant has agreed to sell all the piece and parcel of land to an extent of 76 cents comprised in S.No.111/2 of No.84, Pudupatti Village, Pappireddipatti Taluk, Dharmapuri District together with customary right of way on the western side less the land if any, acquired in future by the Highways Department of Tamil Nadu for road widening. The sale consideration fixed in the agreement was computed at Rs.1,60,000/- per cent totalling Rs.1,23,20,000/- for the above land of an exte
A valid agreement for specific performance requires clear intent and consistent evidence of readiness and willingness from the plaintiff to execute the contract, which was not established in this cas....
Point of law: Unless a statute specifically requires a plea to be in any particular form, it can be in any form. No specific phraseology or language is required to take such a plea. The language in S....
A plaintiff must prove the validity of a sale agreement and show readiness and willingness to perform contractual obligations for specific performance.
Point of law: Absence of any material, that the plaintiff had exercised undue influence in obtaining the sale agreement from the defendant at the time of the alleged loan transaction.
An unregistered agreement to sell does not confer rights for specific performance; plaintiffs failed to show readiness and willingness to perform contractual obligations.
The court established that an agreement labeled as a sale can be deemed a security for a loan if the evidence supports such a conclusion, and specific performance can be denied if the plaintiff fails....
The Court exercised its discretion under Sec. 20 of the Specific Relief Act to set aside the judgment and directed the defendant to return the advance amount with interest.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
