IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V. Lakshminarayanan, J.
K.S.Balakrishnan - Petitioner
Versus
The District Collector, District Collectorate - Respondent
W.P.Nos.36402, 37501 & 44377 of 2025 In W.P.No.36402 of 2025
Decided On : 11-02-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. s.no.621/3 and s.no.628/8 usage disputes (Para 1 , 5 , 6 , 19 , 24) |
| 2. historical usage of land for burial (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 28) |
| 3. local governance and compliance with burial laws (Para 13 , 14 , 25 , 30 , 32) |
| 4. responsibilities of town panchayat regarding burial grounds (Para 22 , 60) |
| 5. dignity of the dead and legal obligations under relevant statutes (Para 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 66 , 67) |
ORDER :
V. Lakshminarayanan, J.
Since the issues involved in all the three writ petitions are one and the same, the writ petitions were clubbed together and taken up for disposal.
Facts leading to W.P.No.36402 of 2025
2. The petitioner approached this court stating that he is the owner of the property situated in R.S.No.628/1 and R.S.No.628/4 of Karumandiselli Palayam Village, Perundurai Taluk, Erode District. In order to reach his property, he uses a cart track situated in RS.No.621/3 and RS.No.628/8 of the same village. He pleaded that this cart track has been in existence for decades and serves as a primary route connecting Kanchi Koil Road to Bhavani Main Road via Pandian Road.
3. The petitioner alleged that a few individuals of Karumandiselli Palayam Village encroached upon the cart track and started misusing the same by dumping garbage and conducting cremation. These activities resulted in polluting the environment and obstructing public access.
4. The cause of action for this writ petition is that it has come to his knowledge that the individuals, who were indulging in the aforesaid acts, are making attempts to reclassify the cart track as a burial ground. He points out that 1.5 km away from the cart track, a well maintained and hygienically operated modern incinerator and burial ground facilities have been established. He urges that despite the existence of this designated facility, certain individuals are utilising the cart track for their nefarious purposes. He added that in the vicinity of the cart track, there are about 500 residential houses. He urges that if the cart track is reclassified as burial ground, he will not have any access to his property. This is because, once reclassified, barbed wire will be erected across the cart track, thus preventing access not only for the petitioner but also for the others.
5. Alarmed at the attempt of reclassification, the petitioner gave a representation on 01.09.2025 calling upon the authorities to take appropriate action. Despite the representation having been received, no action was forthcoming. Hence, he approached this court seeking a writ of mandamus to forebear the respondents from reclassifying RS No.621/3 and RS.No.628/8 of Karumandiselli Palayam Village, Perundurai Taluk, Erode District from the present classification of Cart Track Poromboke to Burial Poromboke. He also sought a permission to take immediate steps to prevent any illegal burial/cremation in RS.No.621/3 and RS.No.628/8 of the said village.
6. Pending the writ petition, 10 individuals filed an application to implead themselves. According to them, there exists a graveyard in RS.No.621/3 and RS.No.628/8 from time immemorial. They pleaded that there is no other graveyard in Thiruvengadam Palayam Village and that, it has been used by persons belonging to several communities. They stated that several of their ancestors and their family members as well as others belonging to the village have been buried or cremated in the said graveyard and that, last rites and rituals are conducted in the very place. In addition, they pleaded yearly rituals are conducted at the respective burial sites.
7. They pleaded that sometime in the second week of August 2025, certain persons, motivated by mischievous intention and claiming ownership of lands in the vicinity, had unlawfully and illegally trespassed into the graveyard and cleared the trees, tombstones, headstones, gravestones etc., placed therein. They did so using Bulldozer and other earth moving machineries.
8. On hearing about this development, they rushed to th













The court emphasized the necessity for compliance with statutory regulations regarding burials, reaffirming that unauthorized disturbances of burial grounds are unlawful.
Reclassification of land as a burial ground must follow legal procedures, including obtaining a license and allowing for community objections; failure to do so invalidates the administrative decision....
The right to life guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India includes the right to dignity and respect, which extends to a person's dead body.
The court established that historical use and prior classification of land as a burial ground take precedence over later regulatory restrictions.
The respondents are mandated under the Telangana Panchayat Raj Act to prevent unauthorized burial or cremation on private lands, affirming the importance of designated burial sites.
A burial site requires a license from the Village Panchayat, and procedural lapses in reclassification of land as a burial ground render such actions invalid.
Proper licensing is mandatory for the establishment of burial grounds; unauthorized usage violates statutory requirements, necessitating adherence to procedural norms.
A burial ground license issued in violation of statutory provisions is arbitrary, as only one burial ground is permissible per zone, which must comply with established rules.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.