Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
B. Vasanthi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background on petitioner's employment history. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments for counting past service for pension. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. respondents' counterarguments and distinctions from similar cases. (Para 5 , 8) |
| 4. court's overview of the procedural history. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. interpretation of rule 17 of ccs (pension) rules. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. final decision and dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 13 , 14) |
ORDER :
K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.
1. This instant Writ Petition has been preferred by the petitioner praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to quash the order dated 05.07.2024 in O.A.No.1728 of 2016 passed by the Hon'ble CAT, Chennai Bench.
2. The brief facts of the case submitted by the petitioner in this writ petition are as follows:
The petitioner was initially appointed on temporary basis as Animal Attendant, under the ICMR Scheme, in the year 1983, and later on, as Lab Assistant in the IMMLEP (WHO) Scheme. Subsequently, she got absorbed in the regular establishment, in the year 1994, in the Central Leprosy Teaching and Research Institute (CLTRI). The petitioner came to know that her past service rendered, in ICMR & IMMLEP, was not counted for the purpose of pay fi
Past service under ICMR and WHO cannot be counted for pension benefits due to lack of CPF contributions, as per Rule 17 of the CCS (Pension) Rules; distinctions between cases support the dismissal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
