SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Mad) 311

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
D. Kanniappan – Petitioner 
Versus
The Government of Tamilnadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration & Water Supply Department – Respondent
W.P.Nos.24341, 24342 and 24343 of 2013
Decided On : 12-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. K.S. Viswanathan, Senior Counsel, for Ms. T. Hemalatha.
For the Respondents:Mr. A.M. Ayyadurai, Government Advocate.

Employees' right to regularization is preserved under prior Government Orders, affirming entitlements from initial hiring dates despite administrative delays.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Regularization of services - Writ petitions filed seeking regularization from an earlier date based on prior Government Orders - Employees claimed entitlement to regularization from 27.05.2000 per G.O.Ms.No.125, with arrears and consequential benefits - The respondents delayed implementation despite a government mandate - Court held that regularization must align with original orders issued, directing that employees be regularized from their initial appointment after corresponding verification of vacancies. (Paras 4-16)

(B) Right to Regularization - Employees with established service tenure on consolidated pay prior to specific dates are entitled to regularization based on existing schemes, notwithstanding subsequent Government Orders - Administrative delays cannot impede rights conferred by earlier government notifications. (Paras 4, 5, 14)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, employees of the Corporation of Chennai, sought to be regularized from 27.05.2000 based on Government Orders mandating their regularization. They argued that subsequent orders and delays were unjust, entitling them to demand their rights based on earlier plans for employment regularization.

Findings of Court:
The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, directing their regularization from 27.05.2000 if vacancies existed. The Corporation was tasked with verifying eligibility and appropriating vacancies. Overall, arrears would not be granted due to time elapsed, but service terms should be acknowledged for benefits.

Issues: The core issue was whether the petitioners were entitled to regularization from the earlier date, amid a backdrop of administrative lag and conflicting governmental directives.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that upon meeting criteria set out in existing orders, employees should not face undue delays in regularization and that earlier rights are to be preserved despite administrative changes or errors. Thus, regularization should be executed based on initial hiring dates, emphasizing the need for adherence to previously agreed terms of service.

Result: Writ petitions allowed, directing regularization based on initial government mandates.

Table of Content
1. identification of employees for regularization. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. delay in regularization contentious. (Para 5 , 6 , 8)
3. full bench rulings on regularization rights. (Para 7 , 11 , 13)
4. counterarguments against retrospective claims. (Para 9 , 10 , 14)
5. directions for regularization implementation. (Para 16)

ORDER :

D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

These three Writ Petitions are filed for identical reliefs and as such, are taken up together and disposed of by this common order.

2. The prayer is in the nature of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records pertaining to G.O.Ms.No.20 Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, dated 23.02.2006 and the consequential order, dated 27.02.2006 passed by the Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai and quash the same insofar as it relates to fixing the date of regularization from the date of order and to direct the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner from 27.05.2000 in their respective posts as per G.O.Ms.No.125, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, dated 27.05.1999 with all arrears of pay, other allowances and consequential benefits.

3. In all these three Writ Petitions, totally 35 employees are involved. 11 employees, who are the petitioners in W.P.No.24341 of 2013, are working as Malaria Assistants/Office Assistants/Tax Collectors/Junior Assistants in the Health Department of Corporation of Chennai. 12 employees, who are the petitioners in W.P.No.24342 of 2013 are employed as Storm Water Drain Workers in the Corporation of Chennai. 13 employees, who are the petitioners in W.P.No.24343 of 2013 are employed as Road Workers/Office Assistants/Tax Collectors/Junior Assistants in the Corporation of Chennai.

4. The case of the petitioners is that the Corporation of Chennai and various other corporations started employing persons such as the petitioners for performing various jobs in several of their departments on daily wage basis/temporary basis etc. While so, the Government, after taking a decision to regularize the services of these employees, framed a scheme vide G.O.Ms.No.125 Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, dated 27.05.1999. By the said Government Order, it was mandated that all those casual workers who were appointed on daily wage basis prior to 04.05.1999 shall be included in the list prepared for the purpose of regularization of their services. It was further directed that the services of these persons be appointed in the entry level post in accordance with their qualifications and shall be regularized with effect from the date of such appointment along with all other service benefits. It was further ordered that the employees be paid a sum of Rs.2,000/- per month as consolidated pay for a period of one year and thereafter, be brought under the timescale of pay. Therefore, as per the Government Order, after identifying the regular posts, to which all these employees are qualified, they should have been immediately absorbed and upon the expiry of the period of one year that is by 27.05.2000, they should have been brought under the regular scale of pay and their services should be treated as permanent from the said date. However, the Government Order was not implemented and W.P.No.11909 of 2001 was filed and interim orders were also granted with reference to continuation of employment. Finally, the government issued G.O.Ms.No.20, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, dated 23.02.2006, by which, it ordered regularization of services of 912 NMRs like the petitioners in the various categories in the entry level posts and 400 workers, working for street light maintenance in the Electrical Department, in all totalling 1,312 persons in the regular establishment from the date of issue of the order.

5. Subsequently, the said Government Order was also implemented by the consequential order of the second respondent on 28.02.2006 bringing the petitioners under the timescale of pay. Thus, it can b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top