Back
K. MANMADHA RAO
G. Ramakrishna – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
K. Manmadha Rao, J.
The batch Writ Petitions filed by the petitioners to regularize their services from the date of completion of 10 years of service in terms of the orders passed by the composite High Court in W.P.No.24377 of 2007 as confirmed in W.A.No.782 of 2010 and W.P.No.27217 of 2019, dated 19.09.2017 and the order passed by the High Court for the State of Telangana in W.P.No.23057 of 2019, dated 21.04.2020.
2. Heard Mr. P. Raghavender Reddy, Mr. G.V. Gangadhar, Mr. Pitchaiah, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. E. Sambasiva Prathap, learned Additional Advocate General for the official respondents.
3. These Writ Petitions arise out of the same issue and therefore are being disposed of by a common order.
4. The main grievance of the petitioners in W.P.No.5009 of 2021 is that they were appointed as N.M.Rs on different dates in the year 1988 to 1993 in Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam i.e. 4th respondent (in short ‘the Corporation’). Subsequently they were allowed to draw the time scale pending regularization and they were getting all the benefits on par with the regular employees, but their services are not being regularized inspite of seve
The court established that long-term service and existing vacancies can warrant regularization, even if initial appointments were irregular, provided the employees meet certain criteria.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
