SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
Vijayalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
A. Ganesan (died) – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. R. Subramanian, Advocate
For the Respondents: Mr. Anand Chandrasekar for R2 to R8
For the Respondents: R1 - Died

JUDGMENT

The appellant is the defendant in the suit in O.S.No.412 of 2002 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Periyakulam. The deceased first respondent is the plaintiff in the above suit.

2. The first respondent, who is the plaintiff in the suit has passed away and his legal representatives are brought on record as respondents 2 to 8.

3. The suit was filed by the deceased first respondent / plaintiff seeking for equitable relief of specific performance and permanent injunction restraining the appellant / defendant from alienating or encumbering the suit properties.

4. The case of the plaintiff is that the suit properties belong to the defendant. The defendant agreed to sell the properties to the plaintiff for a sale consideration of Rs.2,00,000/- and both parties registered a Sale Agreement dated 21.05.1998. On that day itself, the defendant received a sum of Rs.1,75,000/- as advance. As per the Sale Agreement, the defendant should receive the balance amount of Rs.25,000/- within a period of two and half years i.e., on or before 21.11.2000 from the plaintiff and execute a Sale Deed in favour of the plaintiff or the persons mentioned by the plaintiff at the cost of the plaintiff.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top