IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, R.POORNIMA
Mareeswaran – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
1. This appeal is directed as against the Judgment passed in S.C.No.157 of 2021, dated 19.09.2024, on the file of the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Thoothukudi, thereby convicting the appellant/accused for the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC .
2. The case of the prosecution is that PW1 is the son of the deceased. The deceased was married twice and got separated from both wives and used to stay at the nights in a dismantled mahindra van, which is used for vulcanizing work by PW2, stationed at Mudukkukadu Village, in the Service Road, Southern Side of Byepass Road. While being so, on 18.12.2020 at about 09.30 p.m., when PW2 had gone to his shop for vulcanizing work, he found that the accused, who was working as driver under him and the deceased have involved in wordy altercation over a beedi. Therefore, PW2 did not take it seriously and as such he left to his home. On the next day at about 06.00 a.m. when PW2 had gone to the shop, he found the deceased with injuries. It was immediately informed to PW1. Thereafter, PW1 came to the scene of crime and lodged a complaint.
3. On receipt of complaint, the respondent registere





Circumstantial evidence must form an unbroken chain of connection to prove guilt, ruling out reasonable hypotheses of innocence; failure to establish such links results in acquittal.
In a murder case based on circumstantial evidence, mere last seen testimony is insufficient; a clear chain of circumstances must be established to support a conviction.
Prosecution must establish motive and a complete chain of circumstantial evidence in murder cases; mere witness testimonies without clear linkage or motive fail to support conviction.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for complete and conclusive circumstantial evidence to convict an accused, as well as the need for the circumstances to lead to onl....
The court reaffirmed that conviction based solely on circumstantial evidence requires clear establishment of motive, last seen theory, and connections through unbroken chains of evidence.
In a murder conviction based on circumstantial evidence, multiple corroborative factors, including the last seen theory and absence of alternative explanations, can establish guilt beyond reasonable ....
Convictions under circumstantial evidence require a complete and unbroken chain of proof; mere suspicion is insufficient for establishing guilt.
Circumstantial evidence and last seen alive theory are crucial in establishing guilt for murder when supported by credible witness testimony, despite minor inconsistencies.
As the attack is an outcome of the said incident, which took place immediately prior to the incident, we feel that it is a fit case where the nature of offence has to be scaled down from Section 302 ....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a complete chain of circumstances to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt in cases based on circumstantial evidence, emph....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.