IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, R.POORNIMA
Vellaiammal – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by its the Inspector of Police, Keelarajakularaman Police Station – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
1. This appeal has been filed as against the Judgment passed in S.C.No.36 of 2019, dated 12.12.2022, on the file of the Fast Track Mahila Court, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur, thereby convicting the appellant for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201 of IPC .
2. The case of the prosecution is that the deceased and the accused were close relatives. Both their respective husbands had passed away, which led to a close acquaintance between the two women. During this period of acquaintance, the accused had an illegal intimacy with one Mani @ Balasubramanian. On 07.08.2018, the said Mani @ Balasubramanian borrowed Rs.30,000/- from the accused. The accused pledged her mother's jewels and paid the samd to the said person. Later, when the accused asked him to repay the loan so she could redeem her jewels, he refused repayment. The deceased inquired the accused about her problems, and the accused disclosed everything to the deceased. In response, the deceased warned the accused not to have any relationship with the said Mani @ Balasubramanian. The deceased further threatened the accused that if she continued the relationship with this p
The prosecution's reliance on circumstantial evidence and an extra-judicial confession was insufficient to establish murder, leading to a conviction for culpable homicide instead.
Circumstantial evidence and extra-judicial confessions require strict scrutiny and corroboration for a conviction under murder charges, highlighting their inherent weaknesses.
The admissibility and evidentiary value of extra-judicial confessions, the need for corroboration, and the considerations for modifying a conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to ....
In order to sustain conviction must be complete and incapable of explanation of any other hypothesis than that of the guilt of the accused and such evidence should not only be consistent with the gui....
Prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and circumstantial evidence needs a complete chain indicating the accused's guilt; extra-judicial confessions require corroboration and cannot so....
Extrajudicial confession can support a conviction if credible, corroborated by other evidence, and satisfies standards for circumstantial evidence.
In circumstantial evidence cases, each link in the evidence chain must establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, supported by all proving consistent guilt without alternative explanations.
Court determined the threshold for proving intent in murder cases, emphasizing the necessity of establishing clear circumstantial evidence and distinguishing between murder and culpable homicide.
Circumstantial evidence must form a complete chain pointing to guilt, and extrajudicial confessions require corroboration to be reliable.
The court established that circumstantial evidence and extrajudicial confessions can suffice for conviction when they form a complete chain pointing to the accused's guilt.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.