SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Mad) 403

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, R.POORNIMA, JJ.
Selvaraj – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Police, Karaiyur Police Station – Respondent
Crl. Appeal (MD) No. 852 of 2022
Decided On : 05-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : G. Karuppasamy Pandiyan
For the Respondent: T. Senthil Kumar

Dying declarations must be reliable; mere speculation of suicide may lead to alternative charges if harassment is proven.

Headnote:(i) **Statute Analysis**: The judgment primarily relates to the interpretation and application of Sections 417, 302, and 306 of IPC. **Facts of the Case**: The accused was convicted for offenses stemming from a live-in relationship with the deceased, during which he concealed his marital status. The court outlined the sequence of events leading to the incident where the deceased was allegedly set on fire. **Findings of Court**: The trial court's findings were scrutinized, focusing on the credibility of the dying declaration and the evidence thereof. (ii) **Issues**: The key issues involve whether the prosecution established the guilt under Section 302 or whether the deceased’s actions amounted to suicide. **Ratio Decidendi**: The court found the dying declaration unconvincing and overturned the section under which the conviction was made. It also discussed the evidence of harassment leading to the deceased setting herself on fire. (iii) **Result**: The conviction and sentence for Section 302 were set aside, and the appellant was convicted under Section 306, receiving a seven-year sentence with fines.

Table of Content
1. the nature of the relationship and event leading to the prosecution. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments regarding the credibility of evidence and dying declarations. (Para 6 , 7)
3. assessment of the evidence presented against the accused. (Para 9 , 11 , 12)
4. clarification regarding the appropriateness of the charges. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
5. final outcomes of the judicial assessment and adjustments in sentencing. (Para 19)

JUDGMENT :

G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

1. This appeal has been filed as against the Judgment passed in S.C.No.128 of 2016, dated 29.11.2022, on the file of the Mahila Court, Pudukottai, thereby convicting the appellant for the offences punishable under Sections 417 and 302 of IPC.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the accused and the deceased fell in love and were in a live-in-relationship. The accused deliberately concealed the fact from the deceased, that he was already married and had a wife and children. One year before the occurrence, the deceased had come to the knowledge of the said fact. Upon learning this fact, the deceased had a fight with the accused. The accused, without informing the deceased's parents, arranged for her stay in a women's hostel in Pudukkottai. He was helping her continue her studies. When the accused was unable to pay the deceased's hostel fees, he took the deceased to his own house, from where the deceased continued to attend college. Thereafter, the deceased went to her native village for semester holidays. She returned on 28.10.2015 at about 08.00 a.m. Upon return, she went to the house of the accused. At that time, the accused was alone in his house. At that juncture, the accused had a quarrel with the deceased because she had gone to her parents' house without informing him and requested the remaining portion of Rs.500/-, which he had given her for college expenses. The deceased had given only Rs.100/- as balance to the accused. Immediately, the accused became angry and imposed a minor punishment by making her kneel and raising her hands. He also pulled her hair and beat her. Thereafter, at about 9:00 a.m., the accused, with the intention to kill the deceased, took a kerosene bottle kept in the thatched kitchen outside his house, poured it on her, and set her on fire while she was standing in the middle of the tiled house. Therefore, the deceased suffered burn injuries. The accused took her to the Government Hospital, Pudukkottai for initial treatment. She was then referred to Thanjavur Medical College Hospital for higher treatment. Despite medical treatment, she died from her injuries on 10.11.2015 at 07.00 p.m.,

3. On the basis of the complaint, the respondent registered an F.I.R in Crime No.143 of 2015 for the offences punishable under Sections 307 of IPC and thereafter, the offences were altered into Sections 417, 420, 496, 495, 323, 366 and 302 of IPC. After completion of investigation, the respondent filed a final report and the same has been taken cognizance by the Trial Court.

4. On the side of the prosecution, in order to bring the charges to home, they examined P.W.1 to P.W.11 and Exs.P1 to P17 were marked. The prosecution also produced Material Objects M.O.1 and M.O.2. On the side of the accused, one witness was examined as D.W.1 and one exhibit was marked as Ex.D1. The Court documents Ex.C1 and Ex.C2 were marked.

5. On perusal of the oral and documentary evidence, the trial Court found the accused guilty for the offences punishable under Sections 417 and 302 of IPC . He was sentenced to undergo one year Rigorous Imprisonment and was imposed a fine of Rs. 50,000/-, in default, to undergo six months Simple Imprisonment for an offence punishable under Section 417 of IPC. He was further sentenced to undergo Life Imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs. 2,00,000/- in default, to undergo one year Rigorous Imprisonment for an offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC. Aggrieved by the same, the present appeal has been filed by the appellant.

6. The learned counsel f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top