Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B.BALAJI
Real Link Engineering India (P) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Aquatex Engineering – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The revision petitioners in both these revisions are the judgment debtors. In CRP. No.1530 of 2025, the revision petitioners challenge the order made in E.A. No.1 of 2025 which was filed under Section 47 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short 'CPC').
2. In CRP. No.1931 of 2025, challenge is to the order dated 15.04.2025 in E.P. No.194 of 2024, in and by which, the Executing Court has ordered sale of the immovable property belonging to the judgment debtors/revision petitioners.
3. I have heard Mr.S.Senthilnathan, learned counsel for the petitioner in CRP. No.1530 of 2025. Mr.R.Shivakumar, learned counsel for M/s.K.M.Vijayan Associates in CRP. No.1931 of 2025 and Mr.R.Bharathkumar, learned counsel for the respondent/decree holder in both the revisions.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner in CRP. No.1530 of 2025, Mr.S.Senthilnathan, would submit that the respondent/decree holder is guilty of fraud and fabrication of documents and the Trial Court had rightly declined to grant the relief of specific performance. However, it is the contention of Mr.Senthilnathan, learned counsel that having declined the equitable relief of specific performance, the Trial Court erroneousl
An execution petition cannot contest the merits of a decree when jurisdiction was previously established, reaffirming that challenges must focus on inherent jurisdictional defects.
The executing court has the jurisdiction and power to decide all questions relating to execution, discharge, and satisfaction of the decree under Section 47 CPC. However, the court must consider all ....
The court emphasized the limited grounds on which a decree is unexecutable and highlighted that the right of the Decree Holder to obtain relief is determined in accordance with the terms of the decre....
The court affirmed that disputes regarding execution of decrees must be resolved by the executing court, and allegations of fraud must be substantiated with evidence.
Decrees against societies must adhere to statutory requirements for valid legal representation; non-compliance renders the decree inexecutable.
The court ruled that a decree against a Society is inexecutable due to non-compliance with mandatory representation provisions, and strict adherence to procedural rules under CPC is necessary for exe....
The court emphasized the application of Order XXI Rule 90 of the CPC in cases of substantial irregularities causing injury to the judgment-debtor and cited legal precedents to support its decision.
The court emphasized that a petitioner must act with diligence and clean hands when invoking Article 227, especially when challenging an ex-parte decree after an unreasonable delay.
An auction sale is invalid if mandatory notice requirements are not met, allowing a party to challenge the execution process under Section 47 of CPC.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
