2026 Supreme(Mad) 464
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. Subramaniam, D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, C. Kumarappan, JJ.
V. Shiva - Petitioner
Versus
The Inspector General of Registration Cum-Chief Controlling Revenue Authority - Respondent
Writ Petition Nos.24173 of 2019 and 3480 of 2021
Decided On : 11-02-2026
Important Points
Subject
Civil Law - Taxation
Act Referred
Headnote
(B) Courts must not expand statutory definitions or interpretations as a fiscal statute emphasizes revenue generation, supporting the contention that settlements made by grandchildren to grandparents are taxed under standard provisions rather than special rates applicable to family settlements (Paras 1.4, 3).
For the Petitioner: Mr.N.Kumar Rajan
For the Respondent: Mr.Haja Nazirudeen, AAG assisted by Mr.U.Baranidharan, Spl.GP, Mr.P.Harish, GA, Mr.P.Haribabu, GA
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. diverse court interpretations of 'family' under article 58. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner argues for expanded interpretation of 'family'. (Para 2) |
| 3. court asserts strict interpretation as per fiscal statute. (Para 3) |
| 4. court defines 'family', excluding grandparents, for stamp duty. (Para 4) |
ORDER :
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
A.The Reference:
The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 was enacted to consolidate and amend the law relating to stamps. It is periodically amended by the Central Government. State amendments are also brought in with due consent of the President. Section 3 of the , charges the duty in respect of every instrument mentioned in Schedule-I and the amount is indicated, subject to the conditions and exemptions mentioned therein.
“58. SETTLEMENT—(a) instrument of (including a deed of dower)-
(i) if the instrument of settlement is in favour of a member or members of a family.
[One rupee for every Rs.100 of part thereof of the market value of the property which is under [settlement]]
Provided, that where an agreement to settle is stamped with the stamp required for an instrument of settlement and an instrument of settlement in pursuance of such agreement is subsequently executed, the duty on such instrument shall not exceed [twenty rupees].
Explanation.-
For the purpose of this Article, the word “family” means father, mother, husband, wife, son, daughter,[grandchild, brother or sister]. In the case of any one whose personal law permits adoption, “father” shall include an adoptive father “mother” an adoptive Mother, “son” an adopted son and “daughter” an adopted daughter.
(ii)in any other case-
(A) of immovable property situated within the Chennai Metroploitan Planning Area and the Urban Agglomeration of Madurai, Coimbatore, Salem and Tiruchirapalli and City of Tirunelveli.
[Thirteen rupees for every Rs.100/- or part thereof of the market value of the property which is the subject matter of settlement.]
(B) of immovable Property situated in other areas;
[Twelve rupees for every Rs.100 of part thereof of the market value of the property which is the subject matter of settlement.
(C) of any other property.- Seven rupees for every Rs.100 or part thereof of the market value of the property which is the subject matter of settlement.
Exemption.- Deed of dower execute on the occasion of a marriage between Muhammadans.
(b) Revocation of- The same duty as Bottomry Bond (No.16) for a sum equal to the amount or valur of the property concerned as set forth in the instrument of Revocation but not exceeding [One thousand rupees.”
(emphasis supplied)
1.1. Thus, by the explanation, a grandchild is included within the definition of the term ‘Family’. Accordingly, the settlements were charged lesser amount of duty under the above provision in
1.2. A Division Bench of this Court in Inspector General of Registration and Chief Revenue Controlling Authority and another Vs. R.Santhosh and another , (2017) SCC OnLine Mad 32632 by interpretation of the above explanation under