Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.VINOD KUMAR
P. Raju – Appellant
Versus
Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep., by its Secretary, Transport Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the pension claim (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondent's counterarguments on service calculation (Para 4) |
ORDER :
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 and 2 and the learned Standing Counsel for the 3rd respondent and perused the records.
2.1. It is the further case of the petitioner that while he was deputed to the 3rd respondent Corporation, the Government had approved pension for the erstwhile employees of the Transport Department from the date of absorption; that the aforesaid issue was the subject matter of consideration before the Hon’ble Supreme Court and that the Hon’ble Supreme Court, by judgment reported in 2003 (10) SCC 503, held that the cut-off date for absorption of employees of the erstwhile Transport Department into the Transport Corporation would be 01.04.1982 and also issued directions to sanction pension by counting service up to 31.03.1982.
2.3. The petitioner further contended that after joining the Transport Department on 19.11.1971 and he worked in the said department till 30.11.1972 and thereafter, upon being deputed to work with the 3rd respondent, he retired from s
A petitioner is not entitled to pension as his accumulated service does not meet the required 10 years qualifying service, reaffirming the pension rules limiting recognition of temporary service to 5....
Point of Law : A person cannot be deprived of this pension without the authority of law, which is the Constitutional mandate enshrined in Article 300 A of the Constitution.
Entitlement to family pension under the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employee's Pension Rules/Schemes, 1998 is determined based on the date of regular employment or becoming a member of the....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the entire length of service from the date of initial appointment should be considered for the purposes of fixation of pensionary benefits.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of employees to have their past services counted for pensionary benefits, as per the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act and ....
Temporary service may be counted towards qualifying service for pension eligibility, emphasizing continuous service acknowledgment under relevant pension rules.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
