Back
BATTU DEVANAND
P. Latha – Appellant
Versus
Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Transport Department and Chairman of State Transport Undertakings, Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer:Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Declaration, declaring that the action of the respondents in not paying the monthly family pension of the petitioner under Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporations Employee''s Pension Rules/Schemes, 1998 as illegal and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to pay the family pension of the petitioner under the TNSTCE Pension Scheme, 1998, from 01.06.2018, with arrears as revised from time to time, together with interest at the rate of 12% per annum, and also to diret the respondents to pay all other terminal benefits payable to her including grantuity, social security scheme amount, the petitioner''s husband''s PF accumulations, Refund of contribution made by her husband towards Medical, Engineering, Polytechnic Colleges and Institute of Road Transport with interests at 12% per annum, award costs.)
1. This writ petition has been filed for issuance of Writ of Declaration to declare that the action of the respondents in not paying the monthly family pension to the petitioner under Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employee''s Pension Rules/Schemes, 1998, as
Entitlement to family pension under the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employee's Pension Rules/Schemes, 1998 is determined based on the date of regular employment or becoming a member of the....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that only regular employees in the regular roll are eligible for availing the benefit of the Pension Fund Scheme, and temporary services of consoli....
Family pension under 1998 Scheme payable for entire service from joining date despite post-2003 confirmation, on death in harness.
A petitioner is not entitled to pension as his accumulated service does not meet the required 10 years qualifying service, reaffirming the pension rules limiting recognition of temporary service to 5....
The rights of the employees were considered to be crystallized as per the Supreme Court judgment and the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, and the court declined to expand the scope of the policy, citing pot....
Widow of Class-III employee entitled to family pension with weightage for daily wage service (5 years daily=1 year regular), qualifying total service over 10 years; notional from death date to 31.12.....
The main legal point established is that the petitioner is entitled to full family pension with all benefits as per Rule 49 of the Pension Rules, based on the interpretation of qualifying service for....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
